Assessing the economic and environmental impact of remanufacturing: a decision support tool for OEM suppliers

被引:102
|
作者
van Loon, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Van Wassenhove, Luk N. [1 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Social Innovat Ctr, Blvd Constance, Fontainebleau, France
[2] RISE Viktoria, Sustainable Business, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
circular economy; closed-loop supply chains; remanufacturing; optimisation; sustainability; OPTIMAL ACQUISITION; CHAIN RESEARCH; UNCERTAINTY; PRODUCTS; POLICIES; ASTERISK; RETURNS; QUALITY; FUTURE; REUSE;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2017.1367107
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The circular economy is often presented as a solution for companies to increase the sustainability of their business. In many situations where suppliers produce subassemblies or modules for OEMs in a B2B context, dependency on their clients limits their options for profitable closed-loop supply chains. In this paper, we develop a simple tool suppliers can use to quickly assess whether remanufacturing is economic and environmentally attractive compared to producing new components. We derive optimal acquisition and reuse quantities that minimise total costs. Based on our analysis with a supplier in the automotive industry, we find that used core prices and remanufacturing yield rates have a large impact while an optimised design for remanufacturing can only marginally improve the situation. The tool is applicable to a wide variety of suppliers and industries that remanufacture their modules or subassemblies, or are exploring the option to engage in remanufacturing operations.
引用
收藏
页码:1662 / 1674
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the Impact of a Modeling Tool and its Support for Verification and Validation
    Gibbs, Jonathan D.
    Sarjoughian, Hessam S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 41 (04): : 73 - 80
  • [42] Economic considerations and decision support tool for wastewater reuse scheme planning
    Hochstrat, R.
    Joksimovic, D.
    Wintgens, T.
    Melin, T.
    Savic, D.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 56 (05) : 175 - 182
  • [43] Development of the decision-support tool 'Harvest Mate': economic calculations
    Nothard, Brendon
    Thompson, Matthew
    Patane, Phil
    Poggio, Mark
    SUGAR INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 149 (09):
  • [44] A decision support tool for predicting the impact of development process improvements
    Cronemyr, P
    Rönnbäck, AÖ
    Eppinger, SD
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2001, 12 (03) : 177 - 199
  • [45] The practical application of the AMBER software tool to support environmental decision making
    Walke, RC
    Longworth, JK
    Little, RH
    Venter, A
    Miller, BW
    BROWNFIELDS: MULTIMEDIA MODELLING AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, : 77 - 86
  • [46] LCA: A decision support tool for environmental assessment of MSW management systems
    Liamsanguan, Chalita
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 87 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [47] Impact pathway analysis: A tool for improving environmental decision processes
    Rabl, A.
    Peuportier, B.
    Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1995, 15 (05)
  • [48] A Decision Support Tool for Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Extreme Rainfall Processes
    Yeo, Myeong-Ho
    Van-Thanh-Van Nguyen
    WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2016: HYDRAULICS AND WATERWAYS AND HYDRO-CLIMATE/CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, : 545 - 553
  • [49] Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care
    Apathy, Nate C.
    Sanner, Lindsey
    Adams, Meredith C. B.
    Mamlin, Burke W.
    Grout, Randall W.
    Fortin, Saura
    Hillstrom, Jennifer
    Saha, Amit
    Teal, Evgenia
    Vest, Joshua R.
    Menachemi, Nir
    Hurley, Robert W.
    Harle, Christopher A.
    Mazurenko, Olena
    JAMIA OPEN, 2022, 5 (03)
  • [50] Assessing the reliability of AquaCrop as a decision-support tool for sustainable crop production
    Khaleghi, Mahsa
    Karandish, Fatemeh
    Chouchane, Hatem
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2023, 151 (1-2) : 209 - 226