OVERVIEW OF USE OF G-CSF AND GM-CSF IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE RADIATION INJURY

被引:36
|
作者
Reeves, Glen [1 ]
机构
[1] Appl Res Associates Inc, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2014年 / 106卷 / 06期
关键词
accidents; handling; emergencies; radiological; health effects; whole body irradiation; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS; MEDICAL-MANAGEMENT; ACCIDENT; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0000000000000090
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Depression of hematopoietic elements due to significant levels of whole-body or partial-body irradiation due to radiation-induced suppression of mitosis in the stem and progenitor cells can result in life-threatening injury. Successful administration of intensive care of patients experiencing acute radiation sickness (ARS; also called acute radiation syndrome) is dependent upon the ability to stimulate the recovery of surviving hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), assuming the non-hematopoietic injuries are also survivable with treatment. To date, there have been a number of studies involving radiation accidents where patients were treated with cytokines. Although the data overall seem to indicate that the period of neutropenia is shortened and survival prolonged, so far there is no statistically significant proof that cytokine administration actually decreases mortality in radiation-injured humans. Some studies have shown no improved survival when used in a mouse model; however, studies in canines and primates have shown improved survival. CSF therapy is considered a valuable adjunct to treatment with antibiotics and strict hygiene controls in certain irradiated patients. It appears that these drugs do shorten the periods of neutropenia in irradiated patients and must be considered part of the therapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of ARS in a mass casualty situation. Based on review of the human experience with G-CSF and GM-CSF, as well as some animal studies, current consensus opinions support the prompt administration of these materials to patients suffering significant bone marrow depression from exposure to ionizing radiation.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 703
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is G-CSF Dangerous in COVID-19: Why Not Use GM-CSF?
    Lazarus, Hillard M.
    Gale, Robert Peter
    ACTA HAEMATOLOGICA, 2021, 144 (03) : 350 - 351
  • [22] OPTIMAL PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELL (PBSC) MOBILIZATION WITH GM-CSF OR G-CSF NECESSITATES CHEMOTHERAPY PRIMING - A STUDY OF GM-CSF OR G-CSF ALONE COMPARED TO GM-CSF OR G-CSF PLUS CYTOXAN (CY)
    KOUIDES, PA
    ABBOUD, CN
    KOUIDES, RW
    FREDIANI, KE
    BELANGER, T
    DIPERSIO, JF
    BLOOD, 1993, 82 (10) : A634 - A634
  • [23] DIFFERENTIAL EFFECT OF GM-CSF AND G-CSF IN CYCLIC NEUTROPENIA
    FREUND, MRF
    LUFT, S
    SCHOBER, C
    HEUSSNER, P
    SCHREZENMAIER, H
    PORZSOLT, F
    WELTE, K
    LANCET, 1990, 336 (8710): : 313 - 313
  • [24] G-CSF and GM-CSF as therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis
    Cornish, Ann L.
    Campbell, Ian K.
    McKenzie, Brent S.
    Chatfield, Simon
    Wicks, Ian P.
    NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 5 (10) : 554 - 559
  • [25] Immune Evasion of G-CSF and GM-CSF in Lung Cancer
    Park, Yeonhee
    Chung, Chaeuk
    TUBERCULOSIS AND RESPIRATORY DISEASES, 2024, 87 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [26] The potential role of GM-CSF and G-CSF in infectious diseases
    Deresinski, SC
    Kemper, CA
    INFECTIONS IN MEDICINE, 1998, 15 (12) : 856 - +
  • [27] G-CSF AND GM-CSF - BIOLOGY AND CLINICAL-APPLICATION
    GOLDE, DW
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE MODIFIERS, 1989, 8 (03): : 319 - 319
  • [28] DIFFERENCES IN THE NEUTROPHIL PRIMING EFFECTS OF G-CSF AND GM-CSF
    TREWEEKE, AT
    AZIZ, KA
    ZUZEL, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1993, 84 : 66 - 66
  • [29] G-CSF AND GM-CSF IN RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME
    YURDAKOK, M
    GURAKAN, B
    ERGIN, H
    KIRAZLI, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 1994, 46 (02) : 155 - 156
  • [30] THE EFFECT OF GM-CSF AND G-CSF ON HUMAN NEUTROPHIL FUNCTION
    BOBER, LA
    GRACE, MJ
    PUGLIESESIVO, C
    ROJASTRIANA, A
    WATERS, T
    SULLIVAN, LM
    NARULA, SK
    IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 29 (02): : 111 - 119