Forward sequential algorithms for best basis selection

被引:97
|
作者
Cotter, SF [1 ]
Adler, J
Rao, BD
Kreutz-Delgado, K
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Soundcode Inc, Kirkland, WA 98033 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1049/ip-vis:19990445
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The problem of signal representation in terms of basis vectors from a large, overcomplete, spanning dictionary has been the focus of much research. Achieving a succinct, or 'sparse', representation is known as the problem of best basis representation. Methods are considered which seek to solve this problem by sequentially building up a basis set for the signal. Three distinct algorithm types have appeared in the literature which are here termed basic matching pursuit (BMP), order recursive matching pursuit (ORMP) and modified matching pursuit (MMP). The algorithms are first described and then their computation is closely examined. Modifications are made to each of the procedures which improve their computational efficiency. The complexity of each algorithm is considered in two contexts; one where the dictionary is variable (time-dependent) and the other where the dictionary is fixed (time-independent). Experimental results are presented which demonstrate that the ORMP method is the best procedure in terms of its ability to give the most compact signal representation, followed by MMP and then BMP which gives the poorest results. Finally, weighing the performance of each algorithm, its computational complexity and the type of dictionary available, recommendations are made as to which algorithm should be used for a given problem.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 244
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sparse Support Vector Regressors Based on Forward Basis Selection
    Muraoka, Shigenori
    Abe, Shigeo
    IJCNN: 2009 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1- 6, 2009, : 1125 - 1129
  • [32] Forward Basis Selection for Pursuing Sparse Representations over a Dictionary
    Yuan, Xiao-Tong
    Yan, Shuicheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (12) : 3025 - 3036
  • [33] Low Complexity Coefficient Selection Algorithms for Compute-and-Forward
    Huang, Qinhui
    Burr, Alister
    2016 IEEE 83RD VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (VTC SPRING), 2016,
  • [34] Low Complexity Coefficient Selection Algorithms for Compute-and-Forward
    Huang, Qinhui
    Burr, Alister
    IEEE ACCESS, 2017, 5 : 19182 - 19193
  • [35] Greedy forward selection algorithms to sparse Gaussian process regression
    Sun, Ping
    Yao, Xin
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORK PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-10, 2006, : 159 - +
  • [36] Regularization of projection directions via best basis selection approach
    Stainvas, Inna
    Intrator, Nathan
    International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 2006, 4 (JO6): : 1 - 22
  • [37] Regularization of Projection Directions via Best Basis Selection Approach
    Stainvas, Inna
    Intrator, Nathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS, 2006, 4 (J06): : 1 - 22
  • [38] On the Structure of a Best Possible Crossover Selection Strategy in Genetic Algorithms
    Laessig, Joerg
    Hoffmann, Karl Heinz
    RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS XXVI: INCORPORATING APPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS XVII, 2010, : 263 - 276
  • [39] Comparison of sequential feature selection algorithms for liver tumour characterization
    Mala, K.
    Sadasivam, V.
    Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), Part CP: Computer Engineering Division, 2008, 89 (MAY): : 3 - 7
  • [40] Model selection for inverse problems: Best choice of basis functions and model order selection
    Mohammad-Djafari, A
    BAYESIAN INFERENCE AND MAXIMUM ENTROPY METHODS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 567 : 71 - 88