How far can low-carbon energy scenarios reach based on proven technologies?

被引:4
|
作者
Torres de Souza, Jhonathan Fernandes [1 ]
Pacca, Sergio Almeida [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Grad Program Sustainabil, Rua Arlindo Bettio 1000, BR-03828000 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Energy sector; CDM; Renewable sources; Stabilization wedges; Brazil; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; STABILIZATION WEDGES; GENERATION; EMISSIONS; SYSTEM; BRAZIL;
D O I
10.1007/s11027-018-9826-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, nations, states and provinces have been proactively combating climate change, supported by the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) outcomes. In the meantime, several studies have evaluated regional strategies for greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. Although these studies propose scenarios that meet the climate policy pledges, most of them are based on measures that have not been commercially demonstrated yet, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS). The aim of this work is to develop a low-carbon scenario for the energy sector in Sao Paulo, Brazil (whose emissions are significant at the regional and national level) until 2050 and to verify if a proven, technology-based approach meets the current policy goals. Although the analysis is based on a developing country, Sao Paulo state is the most developed region in Brazil. Consequently, the analysis presented in this work may be replicated in other regional settings, with distinct development stages, which demand increasing energy futures. In the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario, energy demand increases 2.6% per year until 2050, and emissions consequently increase 2.8% per year, reaching 235 million metric tons of carbon dioxide (tCO(2)). If four alternatives proposed in the low-carbon (LC) scenario were implemented, 28% of the BAU emissions would be avoided. However, even with this LC scenario, Sao Paulo would not meet the state pledge, remaining 44% above the policy emission cap. This result means that more audacious measures are needed to achieve an effective result. Such measures must push the current technical, scientific, and industrial knowledge and may require a biodiesel share over 20% in diesel blend, extensive increases in renewable energy supply, CCS, and bioenergy associated with CCS. Finally, we suggest some key points to apply this analysis in other regions, considering their own energy mix.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 705
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Material requirements for low-carbon energy technologies: A quantitative review
    Liang, Yanan
    Kleijn, Rene
    Tukker, Arnold
    van der Voet, Ester
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 161
  • [22] How to finance the transition to low-carbon energy in Europe?
    Polzin, Friedemann
    Sanders, Mark
    ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 147
  • [23] Environmental Assessment of Energy Scenarios for a Low-Carbon Electrical Network in Chile
    Merino, Ivan
    Herrera, Israel
    Valdes, Hugo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (18)
  • [24] Low-carbon society scenarios for India
    Shukla, P. R.
    Dhar, Subash
    Mahapatra, Diptiranjan
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2008, 8 : S156 - S176
  • [25] How to achieve low-carbon domestic energy supply
    Barrett, Mark
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2020, 245 (3263) : 22 - 22
  • [26] Energy-constrained and low-carbon scenarios for the transportation and logistics industry
    von der Gracht, Heiko A.
    Darkow, Inga-Lena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (01) : 142 - 166
  • [27] How far can our systemic model reach?
    Messent, Philip
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2018, 40 (03) : 299 - 301
  • [28] A Swimming Fish Bone, How Far Can It Reach?
    Abotaga, Sherif Andrawes
    Gress, Frank
    Yusuf, Tony
    Goodman, Adam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 : S317 - S317
  • [29] Critical mineral demand estimates for low-carbon technologies: What do they tell us and how can they evolve?
    Calderon, J. L.
    Smith, N. M.
    Bazilian, M. D.
    Holley, E.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 189
  • [30] How carbon pricing changes the relative competitiveness of low-carbon baseload generating technologies
    Nicholson, Martin
    Biegler, Tom
    Brook, Barry W.
    ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) : 305 - 313