Modelling antibiotics transport in a waste stabilization pond system in Tanzania

被引:8
|
作者
Moller, Cathrine Christmas [1 ]
Weisser, Johan J. [1 ]
Msigala, Sijaona [2 ]
Mdegela, Robinson [2 ]
Jorgensen, Sven Erik [1 ]
Styrishave, Bjarne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Toxicol Lab,Sect Adv Drug Anal, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Sokoine Univ Agr, Fac Vet Med, Dept Vet Med & Publ Hlth, Morogoro, Tanzania
关键词
STELLA; Sulfamethoxazole; Ciprofloxacin; Metronidazole; Trimethoprim; Degradation; Photolysis; Hydrolysis; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; RESISTANT BACTERIA; TREATMENT-PLANT; WATER; PERFORMANCE; EXTRACTION; REMOVAL; SEWAGE; MANURE; SOILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.017
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Antibiotics in wastewater have become a growing problem in urban and pen-urban areas in developing countries as a result of increased use and misuse of antibiotics. A simple dynamic model, that describes the most important removal processes of antibiotic from the wastewater stabilization pond system (WSP) "Mafisa" in Morogoro, Tanzania, was developed using STELLA software package. The model was based on liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) analysis of trimethoprim, in water collected in the WSP. Concentrations of trimethoprim measured in the dry season and the rainy season were used in development of the model. To determine the model's applicability to simulate the removal of trimethoprim, a calibration was performed using concentrations from the dry season and a validation was performed using concentrations from the rainy season. To test the model's capacity to simulate the removal of other antibiotics than trimethoprim, a second validation was performed for three other antibiotics; metronidazole, sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin. A two-tailed t-test with a confidence interval of 95% showed no significant difference (P= 0.7819) between the values given by the model (CSIM) and the values measured by LCMS/MS (COBS) of the first validation, and the standard deviation (SD) between the differences was 1%. The second validation gave a mean SD= 18% (found by a two-tailed t-test with a confidence interval of 95%) of the differences between CSIM and COBS. The model was developed under the assumption that settling, biodegradation, hydrolysis and photolysis were the only removal processes other than outlet. The major removal processes for trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole were through settling and the outlet. Ciprofloxacin was removed by settling in the first pond. Metronidazole was mainly removed through the outlet, but settling and hydrolysis/photolysis also played a role. A sensitivity analysis (10%) showed that the soil adsorption coefficient, the amount of suspended matter and the ratio of flow rate and volume were the most sensitive parameters. To strengthen the model, the exact removal processes should be further analysed. To apply the model another WSP, a calibration of the settling rate constant and the amount of suspended matter should be performed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] WASTE STABILIZATION POND PREDICTION MODEL
    PREUL, HC
    WAGNER, RA
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 19 (12) : 205 - 211
  • [22] FACULTATIVE WASTE STABILIZATION POND DESIGN
    FINNEY, BA
    MIDDLEBROOKS, EJ
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1980, 52 (01): : 134 - 147
  • [23] A study on the hydraulics of waste stabilization pond
    Wen Xianghua and Qian YiResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sicences
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1991, (02) : 75 - 88
  • [24] Waste Stabilization Pond (WSP) for wastewater treatment: A review on factors, modelling and cost analysis
    Mahapatra, Saswat
    Samal, Kundan
    Dash, Rajesh Roshan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 308
  • [25] Dynamical modelling of a waste stabilisation pond
    D. Dochain
    S. Grégoire
    A. Pauss
    M. Schaegger
    Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2003, 26 : 19 - 26
  • [26] Dynamical modelling of a waste stabilisation pond
    Dochain, D
    Grégoire, S
    Pauss, A
    Schaegger, M
    BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2003, 26 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [27] Design of waste stabilization pond systems: A review
    Ho, Long T.
    Van Echelpoel, Wout
    Goethals, Peter L. M.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 123 : 236 - 248
  • [28] BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS FOR THE WASTE STABILIZATION POND
    AGUNWAMBA, JC
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1990, 52 (3-4): : 237 - 245
  • [29] BACTERIAL ANALYSIS OF CHROMOBACTERIUM SP AND FLAVOBACTERIUM SP IN A WASTE STABILIZATION POND SYSTEM
    RIVERA, F
    BONILLA, P
    SORIANO, S
    REYES, JL
    LARES, F
    ISLAS, J
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1987, 32 (3-4): : 397 - 406
  • [30] A STUDY OF POLLUTION INDICATORS IN A WASTE STABILIZATION POND
    GELDREICH, EE
    CLARK, HF
    HUFF, CB
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1964, 36 (11): : 1372 - 1379