INFRASTRUCTURE POTENTIAL OF RUSSIAN REGIONS AS A FACTOR OF SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

被引:0
|
作者
Plisetsky, Evgeny L. [1 ]
Plisetsky, Evgeny E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Financial Univ Govt Russian Federat, Dept Econ Theory, 49 Leningrad Av,GSP 3, Moscow 125993, Russia
[2] Natl Res Univ, Higher Sch Econ, Fac Social Sci, Sch Polit & Governance,Dept Terr Dev Management &, 20 Myasnitskaya Str, Moscow 101000, Russia
关键词
infrastructure; infrastructure potential of the territory; assessment; fixed assets; fund saturation of the territory; clustering of regions; new Russian macroregions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study is to develop a methodological approach to assess the infrastructure potential of the territory as a tool for monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of the state regional policy in the field of infrastructure development. The algorithm for comparative assessment of the infrastructure potential of regions is substantiated in the article. The authors believe that a regular assessment of the level of infrastructure development (infrastructure capacity) of macro-regions and regions subjects of the Russian Federation, along with the monitoring of the achievement of the targets established, should be provided within the framework of implementation approved at the Federal and regional levels, of programmes and plans for infrastructure development. The proposed method of cost estimation of the region's infrastructure potential is based on the use of an integral indicator of the territory's fund saturation, taking into account the qualitative characteristics of the state of fixed assets. The study revealed a significant spatial differentiation of Russian regions in terms of infrastructure potential that helped to group them by the level of its development. The difference between the maximum and minimum values of the infrastructure potential assessment (even without taking into account the federal cities) exceeds 730 times. The cities of federal significance - Moscow, St. Petersburg, Sevastopol, as well as the republics of Crimea and Tatarstan, Krasnodar, Moscow and Kaliningrad regions have the maximum infrastructure potential. The infrastructure potential is evenly decreasing to the East and North of the country. The republics of Tyva, Sakha (Yakutia), Magadan region, and the Chukotka Autonomous Region have the lowest indicators of territory's fund saturation and correspondingly low level of infrastructure potential development. More than a quarter of all Russian regions have a lower level of infrastructure development than the national average. Based on the correlation analysis, it was found that the size of the territory's infrastructure potential has a direct positive impact on the inflow of investments to the regions and the growth of GRP, and therefore is one of the important factors of economic growth and increasing the competitiveness of the regional economy. The results obtained within the study can be applied in the practice of managing the development of territories when forecasting and developing strategies of the socioeconomic development of new macro-regions of Russia, and also used for monitoring the state policy of infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 186
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Infrastructure for sustainable development
    Scott Thacker
    Daniel Adshead
    Marianne Fay
    Stéphane Hallegatte
    Mark Harvey
    Hendrik Meller
    Nicholas O’Regan
    Julie Rozenberg
    Graham Watkins
    Jim W. Hall
    Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2 : 324 - 331
  • [42] Infrastructure for sustainable development
    Thacker, Scott
    Adshead, Daniel
    Fay, Marianne
    Hallegatte, Stephane
    Harvey, Mark
    Menus, Hendrik
    O'Regan, Nicholas
    Rozenberg, Julie
    Watkins, Graham
    Hall, Jim W.
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (04) : 324 - 331
  • [43] Role of regional offices of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the innovation development of regions
    Untura, G. A.
    EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2010, 3 : 85 - +
  • [44] TRANSPORT AVAILABILITY AS FACTOR OF SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIAN ARCTIC ZONE
    Grigorishchin, Aleksei, V
    Voronina, Lyudmila V.
    Yakhyaev, Dilmurad B.
    Shikverdiev, Arif P.
    Romanchuk, Nadejda, I
    Mazur, Viktoriya V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY SCIENCE-IJEES, 2022, 12 (02): : 507 - 516
  • [45] Infrastructure for regional development
    Samuel, MJ
    REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: PROBLEMS AND POLICY MEASURES, 1996, : 59 - 74
  • [46] The role of digitalization in the development of regions and the use of their potential in terms of sustainable development
    Kondratenko, Nataliia
    Papp, Vasyl
    Romaniuk, Mykhailo
    Ivanova, Olha
    Petrashko, Liudmyla
    AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2022, 11 (51): : 103 - 112
  • [47] Region Innovation Potential as a Factor of Sustainable Development
    Kopein, Andrey
    Demidenko, Kseniya
    Fattakhova, Olga
    Frolova, Tamara
    Lovchikov, Valeriy
    Shurchanova, Irma
    IVTH INTERNATIONAL INNOVATIVE MINING SYMPOSIUM, 2019, 105
  • [48] The New Industrializing Factor of Russian Economy's Sustainable Development
    Aleshina, Olga
    Demchenko, Svetlana
    Suslova, Yulia
    Voloshin, Andrey
    IIIRD INTERNATIONAL INNOVATIVE MINING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, 41
  • [49] HUMAN POTENTIAL AS A STRATEGIC FACTOR OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
    Korobeynikov, A. M.
    EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION, 2008, 4 : 251 - 255
  • [50] Human potential as a strategic resource of the Russian Arctic sustainable development
    Bolsunovskaya, Y.
    Sentsov, A.
    RPTSS 2015 - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH PARADIGMS TRANSFORMATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCES 2015, 2016, 28