Informed Consent Procedures Between Autonomy and Trust

被引:0
|
作者
Macioce, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] LUMSA, Law, Dept Law, Palermo, Italy
来源
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Autonomy; relationship of trust; informed consent; communication; decision-making process; VULNERABILITY; CAPACITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Informed consent has been implemented through a set of rules, at both national and international level, which protect individual autonomy as much as possible from paternalism, abuse, inducement, mistreatment, and deception. However, informed consent must not be merely understood as the outcome of a procedure for the transfer of information, however precise and detailed it may be. The article advocates its being rethought within a relational perspective, according to which not only the quantity or the quality of the information provided is at stake, but also the relational context within which this information is developed. The precondition for free and informed consent, besides the information received, is the relationship of trust between the parties involved, and the consistency between their modes of interaction and the need to maintain mutual trust. In that sense, the information is adequate and relevant not in itself, but as a function of the kind of relationship between the parties.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 35
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures
    Brezis, Mayer
    Israel, Sarah
    Weinstein-Birenshtock, Avital
    Pogoda, Pnina
    Sharon, Ayelet
    Tauber, Renana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 20 (05) : 352 - 357
  • [42] Informed Consent for Radiologic Procedures Reply
    Baerlocher, Mark Otto
    Detsky, Allan S.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (09): : 889 - 890
  • [43] Informed consent: Not just for procedures anymore
    Feld, AD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (06): : 977 - 980
  • [44] Autonomy, consent and responsability. Part 1: limitations of the principle of autonomy as a foundation of informed consent
    Mellado, J. M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2016, 58 (05): : 343 - 351
  • [45] Does informed consent for endoscopic procedures lead to an informed decision?
    Sidhu, R
    Sakellariou, V
    Karajeh, M
    Layte, P
    Soliman, A
    GUT, 2005, 54 : A27 - A27
  • [46] Responding to Trust: Surgeons’ Perspective on Informed Consent
    Martin F. McKneally
    Douglas K. Martin
    Esther Ignagni
    Jason D’Cruz
    World Journal of Surgery, 2009, 33 : 1341 - 1347
  • [47] Responding to Trust: Surgeons' Perspective on Informed Consent
    McKneally, Martin F.
    Martin, Douglas K.
    Ignagni, Esther
    D'Cruz, Jason
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (07) : 1341 - 1347
  • [48] Beyond informed consent:: the therapeutic misconception and trust
    de Melo-Martin, I.
    Ho, A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (03) : 202 - 205
  • [49] Patient autonomy and informed consent - ethical and legal issues
    Wolf-Braun, Barbara
    Wilke, Hans-Joachim
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2015, 50 (03): : 202 - 210
  • [50] Between the Reasonable and the Particular: Deflating Autonomy in the Legal Regulation of Informed Consent to Medical Treatment
    Dunn, Michael
    Fulford, K. W. M.
    Herring, Jonathan
    Handa, Ashok
    HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2019, 27 (02) : 110 - 127