How does technological system design affect value creation? A systematic literature review of digital co-production

被引:6
|
作者
Mu, Rui [1 ]
Wang, Yuting [1 ]
Song, Haoqi [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] James Cook Univ, JCUS Business Sch, 149 Sims Dr, Singapore 387380, Singapore
来源
GLOBAL PUBLIC POLICY AND GOVERNANCE | 2022年 / 2卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Co-production; Value creation; Digital technology; Design factors; VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; OPEN INNOVATION; E-GOVERNMENT; PARTICIPATION; SERVICES; SECTOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s43508-022-00051-0
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The existing studies on co-production display two research gaps. First, most studies focus on non-digital/offline co-production and value creation; little attention has been paid to value creation of digital/online co-production cases. Second, traditional co-production studies examine political, organizational, administrative, and personal factors that influence co-production. However, few studies investigate how technological factors will affect co-production in terms of value creation. To bridge the gaps, this article conducts a systematic literature review of 52 articles. The review results distill seven technological factors and five value categories from digital co-production cases. It further examines how these technological factors affect the creation of various value categories. Based on the review results, this article proposes a future research agenda on digital co-production.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 426
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Roles of professionals in value co-creation: a systematic literature review
    Maijala, Salla
    Rantamaki, Aino
    Kurkela, Kaisa
    Tuurnas, Sanna
    Jalonen, Harri
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024,
  • [22] Trends and patterns in the application of co-production, co-creation, and co-design methods in studies of green spaces: A systematic review
    Nguyen, Ngoc Thuy
    Collins, Alexandra
    Collins, Catherine Matilda
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2024, 152
  • [23] How does burnout affect physician productivity? A systematic literature review
    Dewa, Carolyn S.
    Loong, Desmond
    Bonato, Sarah
    Nguyen Xuan Thanh
    Jacobs, Philip
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [24] How does burnout affect physician productivity? A systematic literature review
    Carolyn S Dewa
    Desmond Loong
    Sarah Bonato
    Nguyen Xuan Thanh
    Philip Jacobs
    BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [25] Co-production of Digital Services: Definitions, Frameworks, Cases and Evaluation Initiatives - Findings from a Systematic Literature Review
    Almeida, Gustavo
    Cappelli, Claudia
    Maciel, Cristiano
    Mahecha, Yamile
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE, EGOVIS 2018, 2018, 11032 : 3 - 19
  • [26] Co-creation, Co-design, and Co-production: Enablers and Barriers for Implementation and Use of Digital Technologies
    Contreras-Espinosa, R. S.
    Frisiello, A.
    Eguia-Gomez, J. L.
    Blanco, A.
    COMMUNICATION AND APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, ICOMTA 2022, 2023, 318 : 81 - 90
  • [27] How does value co-creation behaviour affect enterprise innovation performance?
    Zhang, Baojian
    Li, Pengli
    Yue, Xiaohang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 87 (2-4) : 315 - 338
  • [28] The Role of Nonprofit Organizations in the Co-Production of Welfare Services: A Systematic Literature Review
    Larsson, Ola Segnestam
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AND NONPROFIT AFFAIRS, 2023, 9 (02): : 164 - 182
  • [29] How does servitisation affect supply chain circularity? - A systematic literature review
    Kuhl, Carl
    Bourlakis, Michael
    Aktas, Emel
    Skipworth, Heather
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 33 (04) : 703 - 728
  • [30] DOES CO-CREATION AND CO-PRODUCTION CREATE VALUE AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION? ANALYSIS ON THE PERCEPTION OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS' CLIENTS
    de Morais, Fabio Rogerio
    Pandolfi, Edgar de Souza
    Sanagioto, Luciana Trindade
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MARKETING, 2020, 19 (01): : 117 - 140