Central neuraxial opioid analgesia after caesarean section: comparison of epidural diamorphine and intrathecal morphine

被引:6
|
作者
Caranza, R [1 ]
Teyapalan, I [1 ]
Buggy, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Anaesthesia, Leicester Gen Hosp, NHS Trust, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0959-289X(99)80004-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study in 55 women undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia, we compared epidural diamorphine 3 mg (2 distinct boluses, group ED) with single-dose intrathecal morphine 0.2 mg (group SM), in terms of analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction and side-effects at 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 28 h postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in pain (assessed by 100 mm visual analogue scale), incidence of pruritus, sedation or respiratory depression measured by continuous pulse oximetry. However, time to first request for supplementary oral analgesia was longer in SM than in ED (mean +/- SD: 22.3+/-12.0 h vs. 13.8+/-6.5 h, P = 0.04). The incidence of nausea or vomiting was significantly higher in SM than ED (73% vs. 41%, P = 0.01). In ED, the mean +/- SD time to requirement of the second bolus was 6.7+/-3.2 h. There was a high level of satisfaction in both groups. We conclude that two boluses of epidural diamorphine 3 mg and single-dose intrathecal morphine 0.2 mg provide satisfactory analgesia after caesarean section, but spinal morphine was associated with both delayed requirement for supplementary analgesia and a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 93
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical outcomes following a change in the intrathecal opioid analgesia regimen for caesarean section in the context of ongoing diamorphine supply disruption
    Patrick, A.
    Ali, A.
    Verma, P.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 77 : 31 - 31
  • [22] A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and diamorphine as adjuncts in spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section
    Lane, S
    Evans, P
    Arfeen, Z
    Misra, U
    ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 60 (05) : 453 - 457
  • [23] Respiratory adverse effects after intrathecal versus epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia in caesarean section measuring endtidal carbon dioxide
    Bonnin, M.
    Chow-Chine, L.
    Mission, J. P.
    Bolandard, F.
    Storme, B.
    Rol, B.
    Barriere, A.
    Bazin, J. E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 156 - 156
  • [24] Comparison of epidural oxycodone and epidural morphine for post-caesarean section analgesia: A randomised controlled trial
    Sng, Ban Leong
    Kwok, Sarah Carol
    Mathur, Deepak
    Ithnin, Farida
    Newton-Dunn, Clare
    Assam, Pryseley Nkouibert
    Sultana, Rehena
    Sia, Alex Tiong Heng
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 60 (03) : 187 - 193
  • [25] The effects of intrathecal diamorphine on gastric emptying after elective Caesarean section
    King, H
    Barclay, P
    ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (06) : 565 - 569
  • [26] COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL METHADONE WITH EPIDURAL DIAMORPHINE FOR ANALGESIA FOLLOWING CESAREAN-SECTION
    HAYNES, SR
    DAVIDSON, I
    ALLSOP, JR
    DUTTON, DA
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 37 (04) : 375 - 380
  • [27] Evidence-based guidance for use of intrathecal morphine as an alternative to diamorphine for Caesarean delivery analgesia
    Sultan, Pervez
    Carvalho, Brendan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 127 (04) : 501 - 505
  • [28] Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine and diamorphine for elective caesarean section
    Thompson, S.
    Slorach, C.
    Clark, V.
    Heidemann, B.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 67 (05) : 562 - 562
  • [29] Intrathecal diamorphine or intrathecal fentanyl to supplement spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section?
    Cowan, CM
    Smith, K
    Kendall, JB
    Wilkes, RG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (01)
  • [30] Dexamethasone for prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting after epidural morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia: comparison of droperidol and saline
    Tzeng, JI
    Wang, JJ
    Ho, ST
    Tang, CS
    Liu, YC
    Lee, SC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (06) : 865 - 868