The Political Economy of Municipal Pension Funding
被引:8
|
作者:
Brinkman, Jeffrey
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Fed Reserve Bank Philadelphia, 10 N Independence Mall W, Philadelphia, PA 19106 USAFed Reserve Bank Philadelphia, 10 N Independence Mall W, Philadelphia, PA 19106 USA
Brinkman, Jeffrey
[1
]
Coen-Pirani, Daniele
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Econ, 230 S Bouquet St, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USAFed Reserve Bank Philadelphia, 10 N Independence Mall W, Philadelphia, PA 19106 USA
Coen-Pirani, Daniele
[2
]
Sieg, Holger
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Penn, Dept Econ, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USAFed Reserve Bank Philadelphia, 10 N Independence Mall W, Philadelphia, PA 19106 USA
Sieg, Holger
[3
]
机构:
[1] Fed Reserve Bank Philadelphia, 10 N Independence Mall W, Philadelphia, PA 19106 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Econ, 230 S Bouquet St, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Econ, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
Many US municipalities have committed to pay retirement benefits to public sector employees but have not saved enough to fulfill these obligations. This paper studies the determinants of municipal pension funding and its implications for intergenerational redistribution using an overlapping generations model. Under perfect capital markets, pension funding choices are fully capitalized into land prices. This neutrality result fails if agents face a binding downpayment constraint in the land market: old agents prefer a pay-as-you go system, while young agents find a fully funded system optimal. Empirical evidence based on cross-city comparisons of pension liabilities is consistent with these predictions.