Measuring private transaction costs of European agri-environmental schemes

被引:109
|
作者
Mettepenningen, Evy [1 ]
Verspecht, Ann [1 ]
Van Huylenbroeck, Guido [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
agri-environmental schemes; private transaction costs; measurement methodologies; agri-environment policy; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1080/09640560902958206
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Recent changes in European agri-environmental policy allow farmers' transaction costs (TCs), also called private TCs, to be taken into account when calculating compensation payments for agri-environmental schemes (AESs). This gives rise to questions as to the significance of these costs and the methodologies used to measure them. In this paper, private TCs are measured and analysed using two methodologies: (1) through a survey of general perceptions of TCs and (2) through a one-year registration system for monitoring labour hours, operational and administrative costs and differences in revenue between a parcel of land in an AES and a comparable area of land not in a comparable scheme. The results obtained with both methodologies show that private TCs are significant and not to be underestimated. They represent about 15% of the total AES-related costs and about 25% of the compensation payment. The most important cost factor resulting from an AES-uptake is the income foregone which represents more than 50% of the total costs.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 667
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On the use of targeting to reduce moral hazard in agri-environmental schemes
    Fraser, R
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 55 (03) : 525 - 540
  • [32] GERMAN AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL SCHEMES .1. A PRELIMINARY REVIEW
    WILSON, GA
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1994, 10 (01) : 27 - 45
  • [33] The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes: A systematic review
    Schaub, Sergei
    Ghazoul, Jaboury
    Huber, Robert
    Zhang, Wei
    Sander, Adelaide
    Rees, Charles
    Banerjee, Simanti
    Finger, Robert
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 74 (03) : 617 - 660
  • [34] Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe: A comment
    Moxey, Andrew
    White, Ben
    LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 39 : 397 - 399
  • [35] A multitaxa assessment of the effectiveness of agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity management
    Boetzl, Fabian A.
    Krauss, Jochen
    Heinze, Jonathan
    Hoffmann, Hannes
    Juffa, Jan
    Konig, Sebastian
    Krimmer, Elena
    Prante, Maren
    Martin, Emily A.
    Holzschuh, Andrea
    Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (10)
  • [36] The design of agri-environmental schemes: Farmers' preferences in southern Spain
    Villanueva, A. J.
    Gomez-Limon, J. A.
    Arriaza, M.
    Rodriguez-Entrena, M.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 46 : 142 - 154
  • [37] Exploring farmers' cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes
    Burton, Rob. J. F.
    Kuczera, Carmen
    Schwarz, Gerald
    SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2008, 48 (01) : 16 - 37
  • [38] Technological innovations for biodiversity monitoring and the design of agri-environmental schemes
    Zavalloni, Matteo
    Targetti, Stefano
    Viaggi, Davide
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2025, 305
  • [39] Agri-environmental schemes: Adverse selection, information structure and delegation
    Canton, Joan
    De Cara, Stephane
    Jayet, Pierre-Alain
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (07) : 2114 - 2121
  • [40] Agri-environmental Schemes Require Improved Design for Better Outcomes
    Nguyen, Chi
    Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe
    Hanley, Nick
    EUROCHOICES, 2024, 23 (03) : 14 - 21