Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

被引:48
|
作者
Yee, Timothy J. [1 ]
Terman, Samuel W. [1 ]
La Marca, Frank [1 ]
Park, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Neurosurg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Adjacent segment disease; Minimally invasive; Spine surgery; TLIF; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; FACET VIOLATION; RISK-FACTORS; DEGENERATION; DISC; MINIMUM; STENOSIS; LEVEL; SPINE; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a potential long-term risk after lumbar fusion. Its incidence has been evaluated in anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusions, but few studies have focused on transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Relative risk of ASD with open or minimally invasive (MI) TLIF is poorly understood. To report our experience with risk for ASD in patients receiving TLIF and test its association with surgical approach, we performed a retrospective cohort study based on medical record review at a single institution. Eligible patients were >= 18 years old at operation, underwent single-level TLIF during the period 2007-2008, and had at least 6 months postoperative follow-up. Patients were categorized by surgical approach (open versus MI). Primary outcome of interest was development of symptomatic ASD, defined by (1) new back and/or leg pain, (2) imaging findings adjacent to original surgical level, and (3) decision to treat. A total of 68 patients (16 open, 52 MI) were included in the analysis. Groups had similar baseline characteristics, except the open group tended to be older (p = 0.04). Seven (10%) patients developed ASD. Mean patient age was 62 years and three were male. Three underwent open and four underwent MI TLIF. Risk of ASD did not differ significantly by surgical approach. The MI group showed a trend toward decreased risk of ASD compared to the open group, although it was not statistically significant. This suggests MI TLIF may be associated with decreased long-term morbidity compared to the open approach. Large prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1796 / 1801
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease
    Gu, Guangfei
    Zhang, Hailong
    Fan, Guoxin
    He, Shisheng
    Cai, Xiaobing
    Shen, Xiaolong
    Guan, Xiaofei
    Zhou, Xu
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (04) : 817 - 824
  • [22] Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease
    Guangfei Gu
    Hailong Zhang
    Guoxin Fan
    Shisheng He
    Xiaobing Cai
    Xiaolong Shen
    Xiaofei Guan
    Xu Zhou
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 817 - 824
  • [23] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [24] Completely Minimally Invasive Implant Removal and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease: Case Series and Operative Video
    Kondapavulur, Sravani
    Scheer, Justin K.
    Safaee, Michael M.
    Clark, Aaron J.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 27 (03) : 322 - 328
  • [25] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Two Techniques
    Tender, G. C.
    Serban, D.
    CHIRURGIA, 2014, 109 (06) : 812 - 821
  • [26] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kulkarni, Arvind G.
    Bohra, Hussain
    Dhruv, Abhilash
    Sarraf, Abhishek
    Bassi, Anupreet
    Patil, Vishwanath M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (05) : 464 - 472
  • [27] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Arvind G. Kulkarni
    Hussain Bohra
    Abhilash Dhruv
    Abhishek Sarraf
    Anupreet Bassi
    Vishwanath M. Patil
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2016, 50 : 464 - 472
  • [28] MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Sharma, Arvind
    Singh, Jitendra
    Deen, Shameer
    Tanwar, Akansha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (105): : 17055 - 17057
  • [29] A Retrospective Analysis of Superior Facet Joint Violation Between Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and its Relation to Adjacent Segment Disease
    Maharjan, Sujan
    Zeng, Zhili
    Yu, Yan
    Cheng, Liming
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (05): : E256 - E263
  • [30] Disc Space Preparation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Approaches
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Gandhi, Sapan D.
    Sheehan, Patrick
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Anderson, David G.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (06) : 1800 - 1805