Imaging Characteristics of Mismatch Lesions: An Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis of 1369 Coronary Lesions

被引:5
|
作者
Tan Quang Phan [1 ,2 ]
Lan Hieu Nguyen [3 ,4 ]
Lan Viet Nguyen [3 ]
Lee, Wang Soo [2 ]
Won, Hoyoun [2 ]
Cho, Iksung [2 ]
Shin, Seung Yong [2 ]
Sharmin, Saima [2 ]
Thottian, Julian Johny [2 ,5 ]
Kim, Sang-Wook [2 ]
机构
[1] Quang Nam Cent Gen Hosp, Intervent Ctr, Quang Nam, Vietnam
[2] ChungAng Univ Hosp, Heart Res Inst, Seoul 06973, South Korea
[3] Vietnam Natl Heart Inst, Intervent Ctr, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Hanoi Med Univ Hosp, Intervent Ctr, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Westfort Grp Hosp, Intervent Ctr, Trichur, Kerala, India
关键词
coronary mismatch lesion; tapered vessel; angiography; IVUS; POST-DILATATION; TASK-FORCE; ARTERY; DISTAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOPLASTY; ASSOCIATION; SOCIETY; DISEASE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1177/0003319718822348
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) characteristics of coronary mismatch lesions. Background: Better understanding about the characteristics of mismatch lesions may help to achieve more accurate lesion assessment and, thereby, to improve the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Angiographic and IVUS data from 1369 lesions were analyzed. Mismatch lesion was defined as the difference between proximal and distal reference lumen diameters of >= 1.0 mm or >= 30% of the distal reference lumen diameter. Results: The incidence of mismatch lesions was 20.1% (275/1369). Compared to nonmismatch group, mismatch group had longer lesions (21.3 [6.4] mm vs 18.4 [6.4] mm, P < .001) with smaller minimum lumen diameter (0.87 [0.29] mm vs 1.10 [0.31] mm, P < .001) and more severe diameter stenosis (78.8% [9.2%] vs 66.3% [10.3%], P < .001). On IVUS, mismatch group had larger lumen area (18.7 [5.0] vs 15.8 [5.1] mm(2), P < .001) but lower plaque burden at the proximal reference segment (41.0% [9.2%] vs 45.7% [9.9%], P < .001) and smaller lumen area (4.83 [1.89] vs 7.36 [2.89] mm, P < .001) but higher plaque burden at the distal reference segment (42.9% [10.4%] vs 41.4% [10.1%], P = .023). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that mismatch lesions were frequently accompanied by diffuse lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-3.40; P < .001), bifurcation lesions (OR = 5.83; 95% CI: 4.40-7.74; P < .001), and lesions with a low TIMI flow grade (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.08-2.67; P = .022) or severe diameter stenosis (OR = 3.05; 95% CI: 2.10-4.43; P < .001). Conclusions: Mismatch lesions are quite common and characterized by greater lesion complexity compared with nonmismatch lesions. Further studies may be necessary to address the impact of this lesion type on the outcome of PCI.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 764
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Plaque Characteristics in Culprit Lesions in Diabetic Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: Intravascular Ultrasound and Virtual Histology-Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis
    Hong, Young Joon
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Choi, Yun Ha
    Ko, Jum Suk
    Lee, Min Goo
    Kang, Won Yu
    Lee, Shin Eun
    Kim, Soo Hyun
    Park, Keun Ho
    Sim, Doo Sun
    Yoon, Nam Sik
    Youn, Hyun Ju
    Kim, Kye Hun
    Park, Hyung Wook
    Kim, Ju Han
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Cho, Jeong Gwan
    Park, Jong Chun
    Kang, Jung Chaee
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 103 (9A): : 13B - 13B
  • [12] Coronary bifurcation lesions treated with the crush technique - An intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis
    Costa, RA
    Mintz, GS
    Carlier, SG
    Fujii, K
    Takebayashi, H
    Yesuda, T
    Costa, J
    Kimura, M
    Sano, K
    Tsuchiya, Y
    Lansky, AJ
    Mehran, R
    Dangas, GD
    Collins, M
    Kreps, EM
    Moussa, I
    Colombo, A
    Stone, GW
    Moses, JW
    Leon, MB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 56A - 56A
  • [13] Intravascular ultrasound characteristics of coronary plaques in culprit lesions in patients with acute myocardial infarction
    Kawaguchi, K
    Kondo, T
    Shimizu, Y
    Miyagi, M
    Takanari, H
    Mizuno, T
    Awaji, Y
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 337 - 337
  • [14] The role of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention of complex coronary lesions
    Malaiapan, Yuvaraj
    Leung, Michael
    White, Anthony J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2020, 10 (05) : 1371 - +
  • [15] Deep dive into intravascular coronary imaging in calcified lesions
    Jinnouchi, Hiroyuki
    Sakakura, Kenichi
    Fujita, Hideo
    CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTION AND THERAPEUTICS, 2025, 40 (02) : 234 - 244
  • [16] Tissue Characteristics of Culprit Coronary Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Target Coronary Lesions in Stable Angina Pectoris Using Virtual Histology and Intravascular Ultrasound
    Zapustas, Norvydas
    Pranevicius, Robertas
    Briedis, Kasparas
    Sirtautas, Azuolas
    Unikas, Ramunas
    Valuckiene, Zivile
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (03) : S5 - S5
  • [17] Predictive value of intravascular ultrasound for the function of intermediate coronary lesions
    Yajuan Zhu
    Guowei Zhou
    Lei Yang
    Keng Liu
    Yuning Xie
    Wen-Yi Yang
    Qiuyan Dai
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 23
  • [18] Predictive value of intravascular ultrasound for the function of intermediate coronary lesions
    Zhu, Yajuan
    Zhou, Guowei
    Yang, Lei
    Liu, Keng
    Xie, Yuning
    Yang, Wenyi
    Dai, Qiuyan
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [19] Meta-Analysis of Long Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound versus Angiographic-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Bifurcation Lesions
    Patel, Vishal G.
    Brayton, Kimberly M.
    Khalili, Houman
    Kumbhani, Dharam J.
    Banerjee, Subhash
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [20] Meta-analysis of Long Term Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound versus Angiographic-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Bifurcation Lesions
    Patel, Vishal G.
    Banerjee, Subhash
    Brayton, Kimberly
    Khalili, Houman
    Kumbhani, Dharam J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (18) : B251 - B252