Analysis of complex protein mixtures with improved sequence coverage using (CE-MS/MS)n

被引:41
|
作者
Garza, Selynda [1 ]
Moini, Mehdi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Dept Chem & Biochem, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ac0612269
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Identification of proteins, in a complex protein mixture, using one-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) analysis of its digest, usually suffers from low sequence coverage. There are several reasons for the low coverage including undersampling, wide concentration dynamic range of the proteins in a complex protein mixture, and wide range of electrospray ionization efficiency of peptides under each mobile-phase composition. To address this low sequence coverage, we introduce a novel technique, (CE-MS/MS)(n), which utilizes the most significant advantages of CE-MS/MS, including economy of sample size, fast analysis time, and high separation efficiency, to increase the sequence coverage of a complex protein mixture. Based on these characteristics, (CE-MS/MS)(n) can be performed in which multiple CE-MS/MS subanalyses (injections followed by analyses) are analyzed and experimental variables are manipulated during each CE-MS/MS subanalysis in order to maximize sequence coverage. (CE-MS/MS)(n) is a practical technique since each CE-MS/MS subanalysis consumes <10 nL, and each CE-MS/MS subanalysis takes similar to 10 min; therefore, several subanalyses can be performed in similar to 1 h consuming only nanoliters of the sample. Two techniques have been introduced to address the undersampling: (1) (CE-MS/MS)(n) using dynamic exclusion. In this technique, several CE-MS/MS analyses (injection followed by separation) were performed in one run using the dynamic exclusion capability of the mass spectrometer until all peptide peaks were analyzed by MS/MS. (2) Gas-phase fractionation. In this technique, (CE-MS/MS)(n) is performed by scanning a narrow mass range (every similar to 100 m/z) during each CE-MS/MS subanalysis without using dynamic exclusion. Under this condition, in each subanalysis, the number of peptides available for MS/MS analysis is significantly reduced, and peptides with the same nominal masses are analyzed, thereby increasing sequence coverage. Additionally, to address the lack of detection of low-level peptides in a mixture containing a wide concentration dynamic range, the concentration of the sample was systematically increased in each subanalysis (while utilizing dynamic exclusion) so that low-intensity peptides would rise above the mass spectrometer threshold and, consequently, undergo MS/MS analysis. Moreover, to alter the ionization efficiency of peptides with low electrospray ionization efficiency, and to change the migration behavior of comigrating peptides under a specific liquid composition, the CE background electrolyte was modified in several subanalyses to further improve sequence coverage. The combination of the above-mentioned techniques was applied to the analysis of the tryptic digests of three well-characterized protein mixtures: a six-protein mixture with average MW of similar to 26 000 (standard I), a six-protein mixture with an average MW similar to 49 000 (standard II), and a more complex protein mixture containing 55 proteins (E. coli ribosomal proteins). In similar to 1 h, when the MS/MS of the peptides were manually checked, all peptides that produced peaks under electrospray ionization in the scanned range of the analysis (500-2000 m/z) and within the practical fragmentation capability of the MS (peptides with MW <3500) were identified for standard I by consuming only 200 fmol of each protein. When searched against a Swissprot database, the average sequence coverage for the standard I, II, and E. coli's ribosomal proteins were 57, 34, and 15%, respctively.
引用
收藏
页码:7309 / 7316
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coupling of CE-MS for protein and peptide analysis
    Miksik, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2019, 42 (01) : 385 - 397
  • [2] CE-MS for Proteomics and Intact Protein Analysis
    Kuzyk, Valeriia O.
    Somsen, Govert W.
    Haselberg, Rob
    SEPARATION TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO OMICS SCIENCES: FROM PRINCIPLES TO RELEVANT APPLICATIONS, 2021, 1336 : 51 - 86
  • [3] CE-MS and CE-MS/MS for the multiattribute analysis of monoclonal antibody variants at the subunit level
    Schairer, Jasmin
    Roemer, Jennifer
    Neusuess, Christian
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2025, 252
  • [4] Biomarker discovery by CE-MS enables sequence analysis via MS/MS with platform-independent separation
    Zuerbig, Petra
    Renfrow, Matthew B.
    Schiffer, Eric
    Novak, Jan
    Walden, Michael
    Wittke, Stefan
    Just, Ingo
    Pelzing, Matthias
    Neusuess, Christian
    Theodorescu, Dan
    Root, Karen E.
    Ross, Mark M.
    Mischak, Harald
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2006, 27 (11) : 2111 - 2125
  • [5] Utility of CE-MS data in protein identification
    Williams, Brad J.
    Russell, William K.
    Russell, David H.
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 79 (10) : 3850 - 3855
  • [6] Comprehensive profiling of the complex dendrimeric contrast agent Gadomer using a combined approach of CE, MS, and CE-MS
    Vetterlein, Kai
    Bergmann, Ulf
    Bueche, Karlo
    Walker, Martina
    Lehmann, Jochen
    Linscheid, Michael W.
    Scriba, Gerhard K. E.
    Hildebrand, Michael
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 2007, 28 (17) : 3088 - 3099
  • [7] Biomarker analysis for prostate cancer diagnosis using LC-MS and CE-MS
    Gamagedara, Sanjeewa
    Ma, Yinfa
    BIOANALYSIS, 2011, 3 (18) : 2129 - 2142
  • [8] Sensitive and high resolution CE/MS/MS for protein identification in complex mixtures
    Tong, W
    Yates, JR
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2001, 53 : S90 - S99
  • [9] Sensitive and high resolution CE/MS/MS for protein identification in complex mixtures
    Tong, W.
    Yates, J.R.
    2001, Friedr. Vieweg und Sohn Verlags GmbH (53)
  • [10] CE-MS fingerprinting of Laurencia complex algae ( Rhodophyta)
    Machin-Sanchez, Maria
    Asensio-Ramos, Maria
    Hernandez-Borges, Javier
    Candelaria Gil-Rodriguez, Maria
    JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2014, 37 (06) : 711 - 716