Experimental study on performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil model walls on rigid foundations subjected to static footing loading

被引:126
|
作者
Xiao, Chengzhi [1 ]
Han, Jie [2 ]
Zhang, Zhen [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin 300401, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kansas, CEAE Dept, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Geotech & Underground Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Bearing capacity; Footing; Geosynthetic-reinforced soil; Slope stability; Wall; RETAINING WALLS; BRIDGE ABUTMENTS; BEARING CAPACITY; SAND SLOPE; BEHAVIOR; SETTLEMENT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls have been increasingly used to support bridge foundations as abutment walls. On the GRS abutment wall, large footing loads are applied adjacent to the wall facing. However, so far limited studies have been conducted to investigate the performance of GRS abutment walls subjected to static or dynamic loading. This study presents a series of model tests on the GRS walls to evaluate the effects of several influence factors, including the offset distance of a strip footing, the width of the strip footing, the length of geogrid reinforcement, and the connection mode between geogrid and facing, on the ultimate bearing capacities of the strip footings on the GRS walls. The settlements of the loading plate and the lateral displacements of the wall facing during loading were monitored. Thin colored sand layers were placed in the backfill sand to observe possible failure surfaces developing in the GRS walls. The experimental results showed that the footings on the GRS walls with 0.7H (H is the wall height) long reinforcement reached the maximum bearing capacities at the offset distances of 0.3H and 0.4H in the wall tests with mechanical and frictional connections, respectively. When the GRS walls had the geogrids with longer reinforcement length (2H), the ultimate bearing capacity increased with the offset distance of the footing and became constant when the offset was greater than 0.4H. It was observed that the failure surface started from the edge of the footing and exited from the facing of the wall. Based on the limit equilibrium analyses, under the footing loading, the slip surfaces by Spencer's two-part wedge method had a good agreement with those observed in the model tests. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 94
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Static performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil walls with peripheral soil-cement mixtures
    Derakhshandi, M.
    Rahmati, Gh
    Sadjadi, M.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2020, 27 (03) : 1028 - 1038
  • [42] Influence of toe restraint conditions on performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls using centrifuge model tests
    Zhang, Wan
    Chen, Jian-feng
    Yu, Yan
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2019, 47 (05) : 653 - 661
  • [43] Numerical study of the behaviour of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls under a uniform surcharge
    Djebablah, Wafa
    Nouaouria, Mohamed Salah
    Adjabi, Souhila
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 10 (02) : 139 - 149
  • [44] Analyzing the Reinforcement Loads of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Walls Subject to Seismic Loading during the Service Life
    Liu, Huabei
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2009, 23 (05) : 292 - 302
  • [45] Comparison experiments on geosynthetic-reinforced soil and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls under strip footing surcharge loads
    Ahmadi, H.
    Wittekoek, B.
    van Eekelen, S. J. M.
    Bezuijen, A.
    GEOSYNTHETICS: LEADING THE WAY TO A RESILIENT PLANET, 12ICG 2023, 2024, : 935 - 941
  • [46] LABORATORY MODEL STUDY ON GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SOIL RETAINING WALLS
    JURAN, I
    CHRISTOPHER, B
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1989, 115 (07): : 905 - 926
  • [47] Load-sharing mechanism and performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil under external loading: a review
    Shil, Tanmoy
    Pal, Sujit Kumar
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOENGINEERING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 19 (05): : 895 - 914
  • [48] Reinforcement load and deformation mode of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls subject to seismic loading during service life
    Liu, Huabei
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Song, Erxiang
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2011, 29 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [49] Study on deformation and failure mechanisms of reinforced soil retaining walls subjected to horizontal static/dynamic loading
    Ren F.
    Xu H.
    Huang Q.
    Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40 (06): : 1248 - 1257
  • [50] Physical Modelling of a Strip Footing on a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Wall Containing Tire Shred Subjected to Monotonic and Cyclic Loading
    Hoseini, Mohammad Hosein
    Noorzad, Ali
    Zamanian, Mostafa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2021, 34 (10):