Comparing Domain Decomposition Methods for the Parallelization of Distributed Land Surface Models

被引:2
|
作者
von Ramm, Alexander [1 ]
Weismueller, Jens [1 ]
Kurtz, Wolfgang [1 ]
Neckel, Tobias [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Supercomp Ctr LRZ, Boltzmannstr 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Informat, Boltzmannstr 3, D-85748 Garching, Germany
来源
关键词
Load-balancing; Graph-partitioning; Hydrology; High-perfomance computing; HYDROLOGICAL MODEL; SIMULATION; CATCHMENT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-22734-0_15
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Current research challenges in hydrology require high resolution models, which simulate the processes comprising the water-cycle on a global scale. These requirements stand in great contrast to the current capabilities of distributed land surface models. Hardly any literature noting efficient scalability past approximately 64 processors could be found. Porting these models to supercomputers is no simple task, because the greater part of the computational load stems from the evaluation of highly parametrized equations. Furthermore, the load is heterogeneous in both spatial and temporal dimension, and considerable load-imbalances occur triggered by input data. We investigate different domain decomposition methods for distributed land surface models and focus on their properties concerning load balancing and communication minimizing partitionings. Artificial strong scaling experiments from a single core to 8, 192 cores show that graph-based methods can distribute the computational load of the application almost as efficiently as coordinate-based methods, while the partitionings found by the graph-based method significantly reduce communication overhead.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 210
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MULTILEVEL DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS
    KUZNETSOV, YA
    APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 1990, 6 (04) : 303 - 314
  • [32] Domain decomposition methods for CAD
    Lions, JL
    Pironneau, O
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES SERIE I-MATHEMATIQUE, 1999, 328 (01): : 73 - 80
  • [33] Preconditioners for domain decomposition methods
    Juvigny, X
    Ryan, J
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2001, 42 (8-9) : 1143 - 1155
  • [34] Advances in domain decomposition methods
    Herrera, I
    Herrera, GS
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN WATER RESOURCES, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 47 : 375 - 380
  • [35] Sinc methods for domain decomposition
    Lybeck, NJ
    Bowers, KL
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 1996, 75 (01) : 13 - 41
  • [36] FICTITIOUS DOMAIN AND DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS.
    Marchuk, G.I.
    Kuznetsov, Yu.A.
    Matsokin, A.M.
    Soviet Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, 1986, 1 (01): : 3 - 35
  • [37] A parameter restriction and selection scheme for distributed land surface models and their supporting databases
    Mackay, DS
    Samanta, S
    Ewers, BE
    NAFIPS 2004: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FUZZY INFORMATION PROCESSING SOCIETY, VOLS 1AND 2: FUZZY SETS IN THE HEART OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES, 2004, : 966 - 966
  • [38] Domain Decomposition Methods Combining Surface Equivalence Principle and Macro Basis Functions
    Yla-Oijala, Pasi
    Lancellotti, Vito
    de Hon, Bastiaan P.
    Jarvenpaa, Seppo
    APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2010, 25 (12): : 1017 - 1025
  • [39] PARALLELIZATION OF ROBUST MULTIGRID METHODS - ILU FACTORIZATION AND FREQUENCY DECOMPOSITION METHOD
    BASTIAN, P
    HORTON, G
    SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC AND STATISTICAL COMPUTING, 1991, 12 (06): : 1457 - 1470
  • [40] Parallelization of the SAMCEF finite element software through domain decomposition and FETI algorithm
    Geradin, M
    Coulon, D
    Delsemme, JP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTER APPLICATIONS AND HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING, 1997, 11 (04): : 286 - 298