Usefulness of anti-dsDNA antibody screening with chemiluminescence followed by confirmation by indirect immunofluorescence

被引:1
|
作者
Monteiro Callado, Maria Roseli [1 ]
Costa Lima, Jose Rubens [2 ]
de Alencar Barroso, Maria Nancy [3 ]
Mota Pinheiro, Antonio Tiago [4 ]
da Cruz Neto, Moises Francisco [4 ]
de Lima Abreu, Maria Arenilda [3 ]
Vieira, Walber Pinto [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Municipal Dept Hlth Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[3] Hosp Geral Fortaleza, Clin Pathol Lab, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[5] Hosp Geral Fortaleza, Rheumatol Unit, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[6] Univ Estadual Ceara, Sch Med, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
关键词
Anti-dsDNA; Autoimmune diseases; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Chemiluminescence; Indirect immunofluorescence; SYSTEMIC-LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS; LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY; IMMUNOASSAYS; DIAGNOSIS; TESTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) to detect anti-dsDNA antibodies, using the indirect immunofluorescence test (IF) on Crithidia luciliae as a reference. Methods: The automation system demonstrated 81% efficiency, 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity according to the intrinsic validation process performed using 179 consecutive samples from 169 patients in the beginning of 2011. These patients were subsequently divided into 3 groups according to the co-reactivity of anti-dsDNA results using the 2 methods (reactive, non-reactive and discrepant results). Results: Upon data analysis, 77% (129/169) of the tests were requested by rheumatologists, and 57% (97/169) of the samples were from lupus patients. Both the reactive and non-reactive results of the CLIA were well defined and standardised, and automation reduced the manual labor required by 70% in a safe and high-quality manner. Furthermore, the high prevalence of patients with lupus and nephritis among the CLIA false-positive results corroborates the hypothesis that the actual index of CLIA false positivity is lower than that initially found in this study. (C) 2013 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 418
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the automated indirect immunofluorescence test for anti-dsDNA antibodies
    Wu, Shiji
    Wang, Feng
    Huang, Jin
    Yin, Botao
    Huang, Min
    Wei, Wei
    Zhang, Minxia
    Ouyang, Renren
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 498 : 143 - 147
  • [2] Clinical significance of ELISA positive and immunofluorescence negative anti-dsDNA antibody
    Kim, Kyeong Hee
    Han, Jin Yeong
    Kim, Jeong Man
    Lee, Sung Won
    Chung, Won Tae
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 380 (1-2) : 182 - 185
  • [3] Characteristics of ELISA positive and immunofluorescence negative anti-dsDNA antibody in a routine clinical laboratory
    Kim, K
    Lee, S
    Chung, W
    Kim, B
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 : 373 - +
  • [4] Evaluation of Anti-dsDNA Antibody Tests: Crithidia luciliae Immunofluorescence Test, Immunoblot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Chemiluminescence Immunoassay
    Yang, Jin-young
    Oh, Eun-Jee
    Kim, Yonggoo
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 30 (06): : 675 - 684
  • [5] Detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies: evaluation of performance of a chemiluminescent immunoassay and correlation to the indirect immunofluorescence assay
    Martinez Methol, Maria Soledad
    Ventimiglia, Fernando Daniel
    Aristimuno, Ana Maria
    de la Colina, Amelia Noemi
    D'Agostino, Liliana Elena
    ACTA BIOQUIMICA CLINICA LATINOAMERICANA, 2021, 55 (01): : 21 - 29
  • [6] The clinical relevance of anti-dsDNA antibodies determined by the Elia™ dsDNA assay in patients with negative indirect immunofluorescence on the HEp-2 cell
    Robier, Christoph
    Haas, Maximiliane
    Quehenberger, Franz
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 59 (03) : 541 - 546
  • [7] Anti-dsDNA antibody testing in the clinic: Farr or ELISA?
    Michael Mahler
    Marvin J Fritzler
    Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology, 2007, 3 : 72 - 73
  • [8] DETECTION OF ANTI-DSDNA AS A DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY IN 441 NON-SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS WITH ANTI-DSDNA ANTIBODY (ANTI-DSDNA)
    SWAAK, T
    SMEENK, R
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1985, 44 (04) : 245 - 251
  • [9] Does anti-DSDNA antibody determination matter to clinicians?
    Von Der Berg, L
    Rekvig, OP
    Nossent, HC
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 440 - 440
  • [10] Anti-dsDNA antibody testing in the clinic: Farr or ELISA?
    Mahler, Michael
    Fritzler, Marvin J.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 3 (02): : 72 - 73