Microbial monitoring of spacecraft and associated environments

被引:133
|
作者
La Duc, MT [1 ]
Kern, R [1 ]
Venkateswaran, K [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Biotechnol & Planetary Protect Grp, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00248-003-1012-0
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Rapid microbial monitoring technologies are invaluable in assessing contamination of spacecraft and associated environments. Universal and widespread elements of microbial structure and chemistry are logical targets for assessing microbial burden. Several biomarkers such as ATP, LPS, and DNA (ribosomal or spore-specific), were targeted to quantify either total bioburden or specific types of microbial contamination. The findings of these assays were compared with conventional, culture-dependent methods. This review evaluates the applicability and efficacy of some of these methods in monitoring the microbial burden of spacecraft and associated environments. Samples were collected from the surfaces of spacecraft, from surfaces of assembly facilities, and from drinking water reservoirs aboard the International Space Station (ISS). Culture-dependent techniques found species of Bacillus to be dominant on these surfaces. In contrast, rapid, culture-independent techniques revealed the presence of many Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms, as well as actinomycetes and fungi. These included both cultivable and noncultivable microbes, findings further confirmed by DNA-based microbial detection techniques. Although the ISS drinking water was devoid of cultivable microbes, molecular-based techniques retrieved DNA sequences of numerous opportunistic pathogens. Each of the methods tested in this study has its advantages, and by coupling two or more of these techniques even more reliable information as to microbial burden is rapidly obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 158
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spacecraft Health Monitoring and Management Systems
    Tipaldi, Massimo
    Bruenjes, Bernhard
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR AEROSPACE (METROAEROSPACE), 2014, : 68 - 72
  • [42] Sensors for spacecraft cabin environment monitoring
    Ramsden, J. J.
    Sharkan, Y. P.
    Zhitov, N. B.
    Korposh, S. O.
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2007, 61 (7-8) : 664 - 667
  • [43] Graphics may improve spacecraft monitoring
    Aviation Week and Space Technology (New York), 1995, 142 (04):
  • [44] Insights into the microbial assembly and metabolites associated with ginger (Zingiber officinale L. Roscoe) microbial niches and agricultural environments
    Wang, Wenbo
    Portal-Gonzalez, Nayanci
    Wang, Xia
    Li, Jialin
    Li, Hui
    Portieles, Roxana
    Borras-Hidalgo, Orlando
    He, Wenxing
    Santos-Bermudez, Ramon
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 947
  • [45] Restricting Microbial Exposure in Early Life Negates the Immune Benefits Associated with Gut Colonization in Environments of High Microbial Diversity
    Mulder, Imke E.
    Schmidt, Bettina
    Lewis, Marie
    Delday, Margaret
    Stokes, Christopher R.
    Bailey, Mick
    Aminov, Rustam I.
    Gill, Bhupinder P.
    Pluske, John R.
    Mayer, Claus-Dieter
    Kelly, Denise
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (12):
  • [46] MICROBIAL LIFE IN HYPERTHERMAL ENVIRONMENTS
    STETTER, KO
    ASM NEWS, 1995, 61 (06): : 285 - 290
  • [47] Microbial diversity in extreme environments
    Shu, Wen-Sheng
    Huang, Li-Nan
    NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 20 (04) : 219 - 235
  • [48] Factors associated with the diversification of the microbial communities within different natural and artificial saline environments
    He, Shilong
    Niu, Qigui
    Li, Yu-You
    Nie, Yulun
    Hou, Miefeng
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 83 : 476 - 484
  • [49] Microbial diversity and ecology of biofilms in food industry environments associated with Listeria monocytogenes persistence
    Fagerlund, Annette
    Langsrud, Solveig
    Moretro, Trond
    CURRENT OPINION IN FOOD SCIENCE, 2021, 37 : 171 - 178
  • [50] Halophilic microbial communities and their environments
    Oren, Aharon
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 : 119 - 124