Comparative analysis of oncogenes identified by microarray and RNA-sequencing as biomarkers for clinical prognosis

被引:13
|
作者
Liu, Yuan [1 ]
Jing, Runyu [1 ]
Xu, Junmei [1 ]
Liu, Keqin [1 ]
Xue, Jiwei [1 ]
Wen, Zhining [1 ]
Li, Menglong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Coll Chem, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
关键词
cancer prognosis; comparative analysis; DNA microarray; enrichment analysis; molecular function; oncogene; RNA-sequencing; ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS; SEQ; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVEALS; GENOME; CONCORDANCE; LANDSCAPES; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.2217/bmm.15.97
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Although RNA-sequencing has been widely used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) as biomarkers to guide the therapeutic treatment, it is necessary to investigate the concordance of DEGs identified by microarray and RNA-sequencing for the clinical prognosis. Material & methods: By using The Cancer Genome Atlas data sets, we thoroughly investigated the concordance of DEGs identified from microarray and RNA-sequencing data and their molecular functions. Results: The DEGs identified by both technologies averaged similar to 98.6% overlap. The cancer-related gene sets were significantly enriched with the DEGs and consistent between two technologies. Conclusions: The highly consistency of DEGs in their regulation directionality and molecular functions indicated the good reproducibility between microarray and RNA-sequencing in identifying potential oncogenes for clinical prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1078
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of RNA-sequencing to identify biomarkers in broiler chickens prophylactic administered with antimicrobial agents
    Giannuzzi, D.
    Biolatti, B.
    Longato, E.
    Divari, S.
    Cucuzza, L. Starvaggi
    Pregel, P.
    Scaglione, F. E.
    Rinaldi, A.
    Chiesa, L. M.
    Cannizzo, F. T.
    ANIMAL, 2021, 15 (02)
  • [42] Characterization and comparative transcriptomic analysis of high-altitude adaptation in Tibetan chicken using RNA-sequencing
    Zhong, Haian
    Zhu, Li
    Kong, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Kang
    Tang, Lin
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhang, Bo
    Gou, Xiao
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2025, 104 (02)
  • [43] REPAC: analysis of alternative polyadenylation from RNA-sequencing data
    Eddie L. Imada
    Christopher Wilks
    Ben Langmead
    Luigi Marchionni
    Genome Biology, 24
  • [44] Comprehensive RNA-sequencing analysis of colorectal cancer in a Korean cohort
    Lee, Jaeim
    Kim, Jong-Hwan
    Chu, Hoang Bao Khanh
    Oh, Seong-Taek
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Lee, Sejoon
    Kim, Duck -Woo
    Oh, Heung-Kwon
    Park, Ji-Hwan
    Kim, Jisu
    Kang, Jisun
    Lee, Jin-Young
    Cho, Sheehyun
    Shim, Hyeran
    Lee, Hong Seok
    Kim, Seon-Young
    Kim, Young-Joon
    Yang, Jin Ok
    Lee, Kil-yong
    MOLECULES AND CELLS, 2024, 47 (03)
  • [45] Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments
    Svensson, Valentine
    Natarajan, Kedar Nath
    Ly, Lam-Ha
    Miragaia, Ricardo J.
    Labalette, Charlotte
    Macaulay, Iain C.
    Cvejic, Ana
    Teichmann, Sarah A.
    NATURE METHODS, 2017, 14 (04) : 381 - +
  • [46] RNA-sequencing in ophthalmology research: considerations for experimental design and analysis
    Owen, Nicholas
    Moosajee, Mariya
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 11
  • [47] A Streamlined Approach to Pathway Analysis from RNA-Sequencing Data
    Bow, Austin
    METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [48] REPAC: analysis of alternative polyadenylation from RNA-sequencing data
    Imada, Eddie L.
    Wilks, Christopher
    Langmead, Ben
    Marchionni, Luigi
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [49] An Introduction to the Analysis of Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data
    AlJanahi, Aisha A.
    Danielsen, Mark
    Dunbar, Cynthia E.
    MOLECULAR THERAPY-METHODS & CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 10 : 189 - 196
  • [50] Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments
    Valentine Svensson
    Kedar Nath Natarajan
    Lam-Ha Ly
    Ricardo J Miragaia
    Charlotte Labalette
    Iain C Macaulay
    Ana Cvejic
    Sarah A Teichmann
    Nature Methods, 2017, 14 : 381 - 387