Modeling the carbon budget of the Australian electricity sector's transition to renewable energy

被引:17
|
作者
Howard, Bahareh Sara [1 ]
Hamilton, Nicholas E. [2 ]
Diesendorf, Mark [3 ,4 ]
Wiedmann, Thomas [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Sustainabil Assessment Program, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] UNSW Sydney, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] UNSW Sydney, Environm Humanities Grp, Sch Humanities & Languages, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[4] UNSW Sydney, Cooperat Res Ctr Low Carbon Living, Tyree Energy Technol Bldg, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
CO2; emissions; Carbon budget; Scenario modeling; Energy transition; Carbon footprint; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SCENARIOS; WIND; COST; ROADMAPS; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We report on the carbon footprint of 22 scenario pathways for the transition of the Australian electricity sector to predominantly renewable energy (RE). The analysis employs a dynamic and discrete numerical model that takes into account what we have termed renewable energy 'breeding', i.e. RE technologies are being made increasingly with renewable electricity as the transition progresses. Our results show that every scenario under investigation fails to achieve the sector's share of Australia's national carbon budget for a 1.5 degrees C global warming limit and around one-third fail the 2 degrees C target by 2050. In most of the scenarios considered, the reduction in annual life-cycle CO(2)e emissions in the year 2050, from taking into account the effect of RE breeding, was substantial, in some cases reducing annual emissions by more than 90%. But, the reduction in cumulative CO(2)e emissions resulting from RE breeding only became significant post-2040. Unless a very rapid transition is made to more than 80% renewable electricity in Australia well before mid-century, any positive 'breeding' effect is simply dwarfed by fossil-fuel derived emissions prior to and during the actual transition. Therefore, early, decisive, wide-scale deployment of a suitable mix of RE technologies is needed to reduce cumulative emissions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 728
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The dynamic impact of carbon reduction and renewable support policies on the electricity sector
    Fagiani, Riccardo
    Richstein, Jorn C.
    Hakvoort, Rudi
    De Vries, Laurens
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2014, 28 : 28 - 41
  • [22] An Assessment of the Impacts of Renewable Energy Policies on the Thai Electricity Generation Sector
    Wattana, Supannika
    Wattana, Buncha
    INTERNATIONAL ENERGY JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (02): : 101 - 114
  • [23] Renewable Energy in the Electricity Sector and GDP per Capita in the European Union
    Simionescu, Mihaela
    Bilan, Yuriy
    Krajnakova, Emilia
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Gedek, Stanislaw
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (13)
  • [24] Integrating Non-Storable Renewable Energy into the Australian Electricity Industry
    Outhred, Hugh
    Thorncraft, Stuart
    43RD HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCES VOLS 1-5 (HICSS 2010), 2010, : 2111 - +
  • [25] Modelling Australia's transition to 100% renewable electricity
    Wang, Changlong
    Dargaville, Roger
    2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS (ICPES), 2019,
  • [26] Low-carbon transition: Private sector investment in renewable energy projects in developing countries
    Fadly, Dalia
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 122 : 552 - 569
  • [28] Modeling variable renewable energy and storage in the power sector
    Bistline, John
    Blanford, Geoffrey
    Mai, Trieu
    Merrick, James
    ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 156 (156)
  • [29] Optimal energy transition with variable and intermittent renewable electricity generation
    Pommeret, Aude
    Schubert, Katheline
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2022, 134
  • [30] Electricity sector reforms in four Latin-American countries and their impact on carbon dioxide emissions and renewable energy
    Janet Ruiz-Mendoza, Belizza
    Sheinbaum-Pardo, Claudia
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) : 6755 - 6766