Numerical simulations of concrete flow: A benchmark comparison

被引:73
|
作者
Roussel, Nicolas [1 ]
Gram, Annika [2 ]
Cremonesi, Massimiliano [3 ]
Ferrara, Liberato [3 ]
Krenzer, Knut [4 ]
Mechtcherine, Viktor [5 ]
Shyshko, Sergiy [5 ]
Skocec, Jan [6 ]
Spangenberg, Jon [7 ]
Svec, Oldrich [7 ]
Thrane, Lars Nyholm [8 ]
Vasilic, Ksenija [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Est, Lab Navier, IFSTTAR, Paris, France
[2] Swedish Cement & Concrete Res Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Milan, Italy
[4] Inst Angew Bauforsch Weimar GmbH, IAB Weimar, Weimar, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Construct Mat, Dresden, Germany
[6] Heidelberg Cement Technol Ctr GmbH, Leimen, Germany
[7] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Mech Engn, Lyngby, Denmark
[8] Danish Technol Inst, Lyngby, Denmark
[9] Fed Inst Mat Res & Testing, BAM, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Fresh Concrete (A); Rheology (A); Workability (A); Modeling (E); casting; LATTICE-BOLTZMANN METHOD; YIELD-STRESS; FRESH CONCRETE; ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID; MODEL; BEHAVIOR; SLUMP; PARAMETERS; RHEOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.09.022
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
First, we define in this paper two benchmark flows readily usable by anyone calibrating a numerical tool for concrete flow prediction. Such benchmark flows shall allow anyone to check the validity of their computational tools no matter the numerical methods and parameters they choose. Second, we compare numerical predictions of the concrete sample final shape for these two benchmark flows obtained by various research teams around the world using various numerical techniques. Our results show that all numerical techniques compared here give very similar results suggesting that numerical simulations of concrete filling ability when neglecting any potential components segregation have reached a technology readiness level bringing them closer to industrial practice. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 271
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical simulations of oblique penetration into reinforced concrete targets
    Liu, Yan
    Huang, Fenglei
    Ma, Aie
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 61 (08) : 2168 - 2171
  • [32] On the concrete material response to explosive loading - numerical simulations
    Gebbeken, N
    Ruppert, M
    STRUCTURES UNDER SHOCK AND IMPACT V, 1998, 2 : 773 - 782
  • [33] Model uncertainties in numerical simulations of reinforced concrete structures
    Cervenka, Vladimir
    Cervenka, Jan
    Kadlec, Lukas
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2018, 19 (06) : 2004 - 2016
  • [34] A concept of heterogeneous numerical model of concrete for GPR simulations
    Lachowicz, J.
    Rucka, M.
    2017 9TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVANCED GROUND PENETRATING RADAR (IWAGPR), 2017,
  • [35] Numerical simulations of viscoelastic effects in concrete crack growth
    Cecot, C
    Huet, C
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR, PLASTICITY AND DAMAGE, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 747 - 752
  • [36] Techniques for numerical simulations of concrete slabs for demolishing by blasting
    Plotzitza, A.
    Rabczuk, T.
    Eibl, J.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2007, 133 (05): : 523 - 533
  • [37] Numerical simulations of electrochemical rehabilitation of reinforced concrete structures
    Li, LY
    Wang, Y
    2001 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING MATERIALS, VOL II, 2001, : 493 - 504
  • [38] Benchmark Simulations of Dense Suspensions Flow Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Haustein, M. A.
    Pirharati, M. Eslami
    Fataei, S.
    Ivanov, D.
    Heredia, D. Jara
    Kijanski, N.
    Lowke, D.
    Mechtcherine, V.
    Rostan, D.
    Schaefer, T.
    Schilde, C.
    Steeb, H.
    Schwarze, R.
    FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2022, 9
  • [39] Benchmark PIV database for the validation of CFD simulations in a transitional cavity flow
    Sciacchitano, A.
    Arpino, F.
    Cortellessa, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2021, 90
  • [40] Numerical Benchmark Studies on Flow and Solute Transport in Geological Reservoirs
    Karmakar, Shyamal
    Tatomir, Alexandru
    Oehlmann, Sandra
    Giese, Markus
    Sauter, Martin
    WATER, 2022, 14 (08)