Blinded sample size recalculation in clinical trials with binary composite endpoints

被引:6
|
作者
Sander, Anja [1 ]
Rauch, Geraldine [1 ]
Kieser, Meinhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Med Biometry & Informat, Neuenheimer Feld 130-3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Clinical trials; composite endpoints; internal pilot study design; multiple testing; sample size recalculation; PILOT-STUDY DESIGNS; PACLITAXEL-ELUTING STENT; REESTIMATION; ADJUSTMENT;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2016.1198371
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We consider clinical trials with a binary composite endpoint where the trial is successful when a significant result is achieved for the composite or one prespecified main component. Appropriate sample size planning is challenging in this situation, as in addition to the Type I error rate, power, and target difference the overall event rates and the correlation between the test statistics have to be defined. Reliable estimates of these quantities, however, are usually hard to obtain and therefore there is a high risk to not achieve the intended power in a fixed sample size design. In this article, we propose an internal pilot study design where the nuisance parameters are estimated in a blinded way at an interim stage and where the sample size is then revised accordingly. We investigate the characteristics of the proposed design with respect to the actual Type I error rate, power, and sample size. The application of this design is illustrated by a clinical trial example.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 715
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Blinded Sample Size Reestimation in Multiarmed Clinical Trials
    Meinhard Kieser
    Tim Friede
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2000, 34 (2): : 455 - 460
  • [22] Blinded sample size recalculation in multiple composite population designs with normal data and baseline adjustments
    Gera, Roland G. G.
    Friede, Tim
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 65 (07)
  • [23] blindrecalc-An R Package for Blinded Sample Size Recalculation
    Baumann, Lukas
    Pilz, Maximilian
    Kieser, Meinhard
    R JOURNAL, 2022, 14 (01): : 137 - 145
  • [24] Sample size calculation for complex clinical trials with survival endpoints
    Shih, JH
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1995, 16 (06): : 395 - 407
  • [25] Sample size recalculation in three-stage clinical trials and its evaluation
    Bokelmann, Bjoern
    Rauch, Geraldine
    Meis, Jan
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Herrmann, Carolin
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] Composite endpoints in clinical trials
    Ferreira-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Sola, Ivan
    Pacheco-Huergo, Valeria
    Domingo-Salvany, Antonia
    Alonso, Jordi
    Montori, Victor
    Permanyer-Miralda, Gaieta
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2008, 61 (03): : 283 - 290
  • [27] Power and sample size considerations in clinical trials with competing risk endpoints
    Maki, Ellen
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2006, 5 (03) : 159 - 171
  • [28] Testing multiple primary endpoints in clinical trials with sample size adaptation
    Liu, Yi
    Hu, Mingxiu
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 15 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [29] The Use of a Binary Composite Endpoint and Sample Size Requirement: Influence of Endpoints Overlap
    Marsal, Josep-Ramon
    Ferreira-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Bertran, Sandra
    Ribera, Aida
    Permanyer-Miralda, Gaieta
    Garcia-Dorado, David
    Gomez, Guadalupe
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 185 (09) : 832 - 841
  • [30] Sample size recalculation in multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials based on noncomparative data
    Harden, Markus
    Friede, Tim
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 62 (05) : 1284 - 1299