A self-supervised strategy for fully automatic segmentation of renal dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images

被引:11
|
作者
Huang, Wenjian [1 ]
Li, Hao [1 ]
Wang, Rui [2 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [2 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jue [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Acad Adv Interdisciplinary Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Coll Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
automatic kidney segmentation; DCE-MRI; random walker; self-supervised algorithm; unsupervised algorithm; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; DCE-MRI; RANDOM WALKER; KIDNEY; VOLUME; CLASSIFICATION; TERRAIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/mp.13715
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose An automated accurate segmentation for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) image sequences is essential for quantification of renal function. A self-supervised strategy is proposed for fully automatic segmentation of the renal DCE-MR images without using manually labeled data. Methods The proposed strategy employed both temporal and spatial information of the DCE-MR image sequences. First, the kidney area, the seed regions of the cortex, the medulla, and the pelvis were automatically detected in the spatial domain. Subsequently, all the pixels in the kidney were automatically labeled as the cortex, the medulla, or the pelvis based on their time-intensity signal and spatial position using a supervised classifier. The feasibility of the proposed strategy was verified on a dataset of renal DCE-MR images of 14 subjects without history of kidney diseases. Furthermore, the self-supervised strategy and the commonly used traditional unsupervised method were quantitatively compared with a reference manual segmentation by an experienced radiologist, using similarity indexes. Results The average Dice coefficient (ADC) for the segmentations of the proposed self-supervised method is 0.92 using a ransom walker model as the classifier or 0.86 using a K-nearest neighbor model as the classifier. The ADC of the Kmeans-based unsupervised methods with three and six clusters were 0.65 and 0.79, respectively. The Dice coefficients of the self-supervised method were remarkably higher than that of the unsupervised method (one-tailed paired-sample t-test, P-values <10(-3)). Conclusions The results indicate that the proposed self-supervised approach yields a satisfactory similarity with the reference manual segmentation. Compared with the traditional unsupervised clustering method, the new strategy does not require manual intervention during the segmentation process and achieves better results for the segmentation of renal DCE-MR images.
引用
收藏
页码:4417 / 4430
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Usefulness of anisotropic diffusion method for denoising dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images
    Murase, K
    Yamazaki, Y
    Shinohara, M
    Kikuchi, K
    Miki, H
    Ikezoe, J
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 162 - 163
  • [32] Are Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Images Necessary for Prostate Cancer Detection on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
    Mussi, Thais Caldara
    Martins, Tatiana
    Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo
    Filippi, Renee Zon
    Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
    Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2017, 15 (03) : E447 - E454
  • [33] Imaging of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Cattaneo, Mattia
    Sun, Jie
    Staub, Daniel
    Xu, Dongxiang
    Gallino, Jeanne Marie
    Santini, Paolo
    Porretta, Alessandra P.
    Yuan, Chun
    Balu, Niranjan
    Arnold, Marcel
    Froio, Alberto
    Limoni, Costanzo
    Wyttenbach, Rolf
    Gallino, Augusto
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 48 (3-6) : 140 - 148
  • [34] Carotid plaque neovascularization - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance blinded comparison
    Cattaneo, M.
    Sun, J.
    Staub, D.
    Xu, D.
    Gallino, J. M.
    Santini, P.
    Porretta, A. P.
    Yuan, C.
    Niranjan, B.
    Arnold, M.
    Limoni, C.
    Gallino, A.
    Cattaneo, M.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 43
  • [35] Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the rat kidney
    Fransen, R
    Muller, HJ
    Boer, WH
    Nicolay, K
    Koomans, HA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1996, 7 (03): : 424 - 430
  • [36] Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance nephrography in healthy dogs
    Fonseca-Matheus, J. M.
    Perez-Garcia, C. C.
    Ginja, M. M. D.
    Altonaga, J. R.
    Orden, M. A.
    Gonzalo-Orden, J. M.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2011, 189 (03): : 341 - 345
  • [37] Vascularity and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Frankhouser, David E.
    Dietze, Eric
    Mahabal, Ashish
    Seewaldt, Victoria L.
    FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 1
  • [38] Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Applications in Oncology
    Teo, Q. Q.
    Thng, C. H.
    Koh, T. S.
    Ng, Q. S. p
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (10) : E9 - E20
  • [39] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the sarcopenic muscle
    Nicolato E.
    Farace P.
    Asperio R.M.
    Marzola P.
    Lunati E.
    Sbarbati A.
    Osculati F.
    BMC Medical Imaging, 2 (1)
  • [40] Parameter Selection in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Tomography
    Niinimaki, Kati
    Hanhela, M.
    Kolehmainen, V.
    MATHEMATICAL AND NUMERICAL APPROACHES FOR MULTI-WAVE INVERSE PROBLEMS, CIRM, 2020, 328 : 73 - 89