Levels and determinants of pesticide exposure in vineyards: Results of the PESTEXPO study

被引:35
|
作者
Baldi, Isabelle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lebailly, P. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Bouvier, G. [1 ,2 ]
Rondeau, V. [2 ]
Kientz-Bouchart, V. [4 ,7 ]
Canal-Raffin, M. [1 ,2 ]
Garrigou, A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, ISPED, Lab Sante Travail Environm, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[2] INSERM, ISPED, Ctr INSERM, U897 Epidemiol Biostat, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[3] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Med Travail, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[4] INSERM, UMR1086 Canc & Prevent, F-14000 Caen, France
[5] Univ Caen Basse Normandie, F-14000 Caen, France
[6] Ctr Francois Baclesse, F-14000 Caen, France
[7] Lab Dept Frank Duncombe, F-14000 Caen, France
关键词
Exposure modeling; Field study; Harvesting; Pesticides; Re-entry tasks; WORKER REENTRY RESEARCH; DERMAL EXPOSURE; CALIFORNIA CITRUS; GRAPE HARVESTERS; RESIDUES; AZINPHOSMETHYL; GREENHOUSES; CAPTAN; CULTIVATION; INTERVALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2014.04.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Physical contact with branches, leaves, fruit or vegetables in previously treated crops is responsible for the transfer of pesticides to the worker's skin in agricultural tasks such as harvesting, pruning, thinning, cutting or sorting. Few studies have documented workers' exposure during re-entry in vineyards. In the PESTEXPO study, we described levels of exposure and analyzed their determinants during re-entry and harvesting in vineyards in the Bordeaux area, France. Between 2002 and 2007, volunteers performing re-entry tasks (N=46 days) or harvesting (N=48 days) after dithiocarbamate or folpet treatment were observed. Detailed information on the tasks was collected and dermal contamination was assessed using patches placed on the skin and hand-washing at the end of each working phase. Daily median contamination was 1 967.7 mu l of mixture during re-entry (90(e) percentile: 5 045.3 mu l) and 18.7 mu l during harvesting (90(e) percentile: 911.4 mu l. The type of task was the parameter found to be the most strongly associated with contamination. For re-entry, the highest contaminations were observed during raising of wires and cutting of branches. During the harvest, the contamination was maximal for grape-picking. The delay since the last treatment and the rate of active ingredient per hectare played a role, together with other factors such as meteorological factors, crop and farm characteristics, gloves and clothes. Our results underline the necessity to take into account exposures during re-entry and harvest when considering pesticide exposure, both for epidemiological research and preventive action. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 369
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Household pesticide exposure and childhood leukemia: Results from a case-control study
    Ma, X
    Buffler, PA
    Gunier, R
    Reinier, K
    Reynolds, P
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (04) : S42 - S42
  • [22] Pesticide Exposure in Fruit-Growers: Comparing Levels and Determinants Assessed under Usual Conditions of Work (CANEPA Study) with Those Predicted by Registration Process (Agricultural Operator Exposure Model)
    Bresson, Morgane
    Bureau, Mathilde
    Le Goff, Jeremie
    Lecluse, Yannick
    Robelot, Elsa
    Delamare, Justine
    Baldi, Isabelle
    Lebailly, Pierre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (08)
  • [23] Reporting pesticide exposure results to participants: Issues and observations
    Hoppin, JA
    Arcury, TA
    Quandt, SA
    Rao, P
    Doran, AM
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) : S133 - S133
  • [24] The relationship between breast cancer and pesticide exposure in regions with differing pesticide use levels
    Alarcon, R.
    Requena, M.
    Hernandez, A. F.
    Parron, T.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 205 : S226 - S226
  • [25] Screening for pesticide exposure: A case study
    Quackenbush, R
    Hackley, B
    Dixon, J
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 51 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [26] Determinants of exposure levels of bisphenols in flemish adolescents
    Gys, Celine
    Bastiaensen, Michiel
    Bruckers, Liesbeth
    Colles, Ann
    Govarts, Eva
    Martin, Laura Rodriguez
    Verheyen, Veerle
    Koppen, Gudrun
    Morrens, Bert
    Den Hond, Elly
    De Decker, Annelies
    Schoeters, Greet
    Covaci, Adrian
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 193
  • [27] Mercury exposure in French Guiana: Levels and determinants
    Cordier, S
    Grasmick, C
    Paquier-Passelaigue, M
    Mandereau, L
    Weber, JP
    Jouan, M
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1998, 53 (04): : 299 - 303
  • [28] Levels and determinants of exposure to vapours and aerosols of bitumen
    Spickenheuer A.
    Rühl R.
    Höber D.
    Raulf-Heimsoth M.
    Marczynski B.
    Welge P.
    Breuer D.
    Gabriel S.
    Musanke U.
    Rode P.
    Heinze E.
    Kendzia B.
    Bramer R.
    Knecht U.
    Hahn J.-U.
    Brüning T.
    Pesch B.
    Archives of Toxicology, 2011, 85 (Suppl 1) : S21 - S28
  • [29] The determinants of dermal exposure ranking method (DERM):: A pesticide exposure assessment approach for developing countries
    Blanco, Luis E.
    Aragon, Aurora
    Lundberg, Ingvar
    Wesseling, Catharina
    Nise, Gun
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2008, 52 (06): : 535 - 544
  • [30] A review of pesticide residue levels and their related health exposure risks
    Fothergill, A.
    Abdelghani, A.
    FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT II: THE QUEST FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2013, 170 : 195 - 205