CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ACCURACY OF THE MFL PIPELINE INSPECTION TOOLS

被引:0
|
作者
Salama, Mamdouh M. [1 ]
Nestleroth, Bruce J.
Maes, Marc A.
Rodriguez, Carlos [1 ]
Blumer, Dave
机构
[1] ConocoPhillips Co, Houston, TX USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) intelligent pigs are the most common tools used for pipeline inspection. But, the MFL inspection results are subject to various sources of uncertainties which must be quantified and accounted for in the integrity assessment of the inspected pipeline. A series of pull-through tests (PTT) of seven MFL tools from four service providers was performed on a 12-inch diameter pipe containing preexisting internal corrosion defects of various length, width, and depth, and located in a variety of circumferential and longitudinal positions. The results of these tests are used to quantify the detectability statistics and the sizing uncertainties of the different tools for future use in developing calibrated probabilistic models for reliability based inspection, quantitative risk assessment and life extension studies for pipelines.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 251
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pipeline Mapping with Next Generation Spherical In-Line Inspection Tools
    Kennedy, Marshall
    Toffin, Eric
    Down, Alexander
    PIPELINES 2024: CONDITION ASSESSMENT, 2024, : 222 - 231
  • [32] Pipeline inspection
    JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2007, 59 (03):
  • [33] Ultrasonic or MFL Inspection: Which Technology Is Better for You?
    Goedecke, Hartmut
    Pipeline and Gas Journal, 2003, 230 (10): : 34 - 41
  • [34] Effect analysis of nearby defect on MFL in steel pipeline
    School of Mechatronics Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
    不详
    Dianzi Keji Diaxue Xuebao, 2008, 5 (797-800):
  • [35] Error-reduction approach for corrosion measurements of pipeline inline inspection tools
    Hamed, Yaman
    Shafie, A'fza
    Mustaffa, Zahiraniza
    Rusma, Naila
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2019, 52 (1-2): : 28 - 36
  • [36] Ultrasonic or MFL inspection: Which technology is better for you?
    Goedecke, H
    PIPELINE & GAS JOURNAL, 2003, 230 (10) : 34 - +
  • [37] Matching pipeline In-line inspection data for corrosion characterization
    Liu, Huan
    Liu, Zheng
    Taylor, Brandon
    Dong, Haobin
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 101 : 44 - 52
  • [38] 3D reconstruction technology of the MFL inspection data
    Song, Xiaochun
    Zhao, Daxing
    Zhong, Yuning
    Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng/China Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 19 (08): : 905 - 908
  • [39] GRI PROGRAM TO DEVELOP PERFORMANCE DATA ON IN-LINE-INSPECTION TOOLS FOR PIPELINE REVALIDATION
    EIBER, RJ
    KIEFNER, JF
    HYATT, RW
    KOTHARI, KM
    AGA 1989 OPERATING SECTION PROCEEDINGS, 1989, : 409 - 413
  • [40] Method propose for calibrating MFL, UT ILI tools
    Caleyo, F
    Alfonso, L
    Hallen, JM
    González, JL
    Pérez-Baruch, E
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2004, 102 (34) : 76 - +