Effect of supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation on the stability of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cages under physiologic compressive preloads

被引:46
|
作者
Phillips, FM
Cunningham, B
Carandang, G
Ghanayem, AJ
Voronov, L
Havey, RM
Patwardhan, AG
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
[2] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Spine Ctr, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Dept Vet Affairs, Edward Hines Jr VA Hosp, Musculoskeletal Biomech Lab, Hines, IL USA
关键词
lumbar; anterior threaded cage; translaminar facet screw; stabilization; compressive preload;
D O I
10.1097/01.BRS.0000134570.08901.30
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A biomechanical study of lumbar threaded interbody cage construct under varying compressive preloads of similar magnitudes to those experienced in vivo during daily activities. Objectives. To test the hypothesis that supplemental translaminar facet screws would enhance the stability ( ability to reduce segmental angular motion) of threaded interbody cages in flexion-extension during activities in which the spine is subjected to low compressive preloads, and therefore the stand-alone interbody cage construct is least stable. Summary of Background Data. Controversy exists over whether threaded anteriorly placed interbody cages can be routinely used as "stand-alone" devices or whether they require supplemental posterior stabilization to achieve successful fusion. Biomechanical studies suggest that under conditions of low preloads, the motion segment treated with stand-alone cages might be less stable, particularly in extension. Methods. Eight human lumbar spine specimens ( from L1 to sacrum) were tested intact, after insertion of 2 threaded cylindrical cages (BAK) at L5-S1 and after supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation. They were subjected to flexion and extension moments under progressively increasing magnitude of externally applied compressive follower preload from 0 to 1200 N. The range of angular motion in flexion-extension at L5-S1 was analyzed to assess the effect of translaminar facet screws on the stability of the cage construct for different compressive preloads. Results. In flexion, over 0 to 400 N preload, the supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation reduced the L5-S1 angular motion relative to intact by 71% to 74% as compared to 40% to 44% for the cages alone. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In extension at 0 N preload, the cages allowed more angular motion than the intact segment, whereas with translaminar facet screw fixation, the motion was reduced to the level of the intact segment. At 400 N preload, supplemental TLFS fixation significantly increased the stability of the cages, reducing the extension angular motion by 60% of intact (P = 0.04). Supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation did not significantly increase the stability provided by the cages in flexion or extension at the 1200 N preload magnitude. Conclusions. In vivo during activities of daily living, interbody cage constructs are subject to varying compressive preloads due to external loads generated by paraspinal musculature, and our results suggest that the stability created by the cage (reduction in segmental angular motion) is not constant. The cage construct is likely to be least stable in extension during activities that impart low compressive preloads to the lumbar spine. Supplemental translaminar facet screw fixation will enhance stability of the motion segment treated with threaded cages, particularly during conditions of low compressive preloads, the very condition in which the cage alone is least effective in providing stability.
引用
收藏
页码:1731 / 1736
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Harvey, Jackson P.
    Khanna, Krishn
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Harada, Garrett K.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Singh, Kern
    Dewald, Christopher
    An, Howard S.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [12] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation - a finite element analysis
    Kyung-Chul Choi
    Kyeong-Sik Ryu
    Sang-Ho Lee
    Yeong Hyeon Kim
    Sung Jae Lee
    Chun-Kun Park
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [13] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation - a finite element analysis
    Choi, Kyung-Chul
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Kim, Yeong Hyeon
    Lee, Sung Jae
    Park, Chun-Kun
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [14] Comparison of Lumbar Laminectomy Alone, Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion, Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature
    Shah, Manan
    Kolb, Bradley
    Yilmaz, Emre
    Halalmeh, Dia R.
    Moisi, Marc D.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [15] Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody, and Anterior/Posterior Fusion: Analysis of Fusion Outcomes and Costs
    Bozzio, Anthony E.
    Johnson, Christopher R.
    Fattor, Jill A.
    Kleck, Christopher J.
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Burger, Evalina L.
    Noshchenko, Andriy
    Cain, Christopher M. J.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (05) : E655 - E662
  • [16] The rate of fusion for stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review
    Manzur, Mustfa
    Virk, Sohrab S.
    Jivanelli, Bridget
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Gang, Catherine Himo
    Qureshi, Sheeraz
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (07): : 1294 - 1301
  • [17] Stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    Ghent, Finn
    Phan, Kevin
    Lee, Keegan
    Reddy, Rajesh
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (10) : 1619 - 1624
  • [18] Bilateral posterior cervical cages provide biomechanical stability: assessment of stand-alone and supplemental fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Voronov, Leonard I.
    Siemionow, Krzysztof B.
    Havey, Robert M.
    Carandang, Gerard
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Patwardhan, Avinash G.
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 223 - 230
  • [19] A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: Biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques
    Cain, CMJ
    Schleicher, P
    Gerlach, R
    Pflugmacher, R
    Scholz, M
    Kandziora, F
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) : 2631 - 2636
  • [20] Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous translaminar facet screw fixation in elderly patients Clinical article
    Park, Sung Hun
    Park, Woo Min
    Park, Cheul Woong
    Kang, Kwan Soo
    Lee, Young Keun
    Lim, Sang Rak
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 10 (06) : 610 - 616