Free-choice learning in agritourism

被引:5
|
作者
Van Winkle, Christine [1 ]
Bueddefeld, Jill [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Fac Kinesiol & Recreat Management, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Kinesiol Sport & Recreat, Univ Hall,Van Vliet Complex, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
关键词
Free-choice learning; agritourism; agritourism learning; mixed-methods; agricultural literacy; SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR; TYPOLOGY; DEMAND; FARM;
D O I
10.1080/16078055.2020.1832025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Agritourism is an effective way to promote sustainable agricultural practices and agricultural literacy. As such, agritourism is an increasingly important way for the general public to learn about agricultural practices, issues, and concepts. It is commonly assumed that agritourism experiences result in learning, yet there is very little research that demonstrates this or explores what kind of learning is possible. This research used personal meaning maps to understand visitors' free-choice learning in different agritourism contexts. The data was analyzed using a mixed-methods approach, where the qualitative data provided insight into the categories of agricultural learning, and the quantitative data demonstrated how much learning occurred in relation to extent, breadth, depth, and mastery of learning. This research found that all forms of agritourism broadly supported visitors' free-choice learning but occurred primarily in relation to breadth and extent, rather than depth and mastery of learning. Supporting prior research in agritourism and learning, these results demonstrate the effectiveness of all forms of agritourism in facilitating meaningful learning but that many of these learning opportunities remain poorly planned for. Deeper and more complex forms of learning are possible when intentionally linking agritourism experiences to agricultural literacy goals.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 200
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] IOR Effects in a Social Free-Choice Task
    Reid, Connor
    Wong, Lokman
    Pratt, Jay
    Morgan, Catherine
    Welsh, Timothy N.
    JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2013, 45 (04) : 307 - 311
  • [42] MODELING MEAL ACCEPTABILITY IN A FREE-CHOICE ENVIRONMENT
    HEDDERLEY, DI
    MEISELMAN, HL
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 1995, 6 (01) : 15 - 26
  • [43] Reward Influences Masked Free-Choice Priming
    Prasad, Seema
    Mishra, Ramesh Kumar
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [44] On probabilistic diagnosis for free-choice Petri Nets
    Flochova, Jana
    Boel, Rene K.
    Jiroveanu, George
    2007 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-13, 2007, : 5541 - +
  • [45] EXTENSION OF FREE-CHOICE OF LIGHTING TO HOODED RAT
    FISHMAN, R
    ROFFWARG, H
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1972, 9 (01) : 112 - &
  • [46] SENSORY EVALUATION OF ACIDS BY FREE-CHOICE PROFILING
    RUBICO, SM
    MCDANIEL, MR
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 1992, 17 (03) : 273 - 289
  • [47] FREE-CHOICE RUMENSIN SUPPLEMENTS FOR GRAZING STEERS
    HILL, GM
    HARPEL, RA
    DAVIS, JH
    LOUISIANA AGRICULTURE, 1980, 24 (01): : 6 - 8
  • [48] SEXUAL AROUSAL AND AGGRESSION IN A FREE-CHOICE SITUATION
    GRAVES, W
    LYNCH, DJ
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1987, 60 (01) : 95 - 104
  • [49] Classroom features supporting free-choice transfer
    Elliott, Leslie Atkins
    2016 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2016, : 40 - 43
  • [50] Free-choice feeding of free-range meat chickens
    Fanatico, A. C.
    Brewer, V. B.
    Owens, C. M.
    Donoghue, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 225 - 225