Free-choice learning in agritourism

被引:5
|
作者
Van Winkle, Christine [1 ]
Bueddefeld, Jill [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Fac Kinesiol & Recreat Management, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Kinesiol Sport & Recreat, Univ Hall,Van Vliet Complex, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
关键词
Free-choice learning; agritourism; agritourism learning; mixed-methods; agricultural literacy; SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR; TYPOLOGY; DEMAND; FARM;
D O I
10.1080/16078055.2020.1832025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Agritourism is an effective way to promote sustainable agricultural practices and agricultural literacy. As such, agritourism is an increasingly important way for the general public to learn about agricultural practices, issues, and concepts. It is commonly assumed that agritourism experiences result in learning, yet there is very little research that demonstrates this or explores what kind of learning is possible. This research used personal meaning maps to understand visitors' free-choice learning in different agritourism contexts. The data was analyzed using a mixed-methods approach, where the qualitative data provided insight into the categories of agricultural learning, and the quantitative data demonstrated how much learning occurred in relation to extent, breadth, depth, and mastery of learning. This research found that all forms of agritourism broadly supported visitors' free-choice learning but occurred primarily in relation to breadth and extent, rather than depth and mastery of learning. Supporting prior research in agritourism and learning, these results demonstrate the effectiveness of all forms of agritourism in facilitating meaningful learning but that many of these learning opportunities remain poorly planned for. Deeper and more complex forms of learning are possible when intentionally linking agritourism experiences to agricultural literacy goals.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 200
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Free-Choice Learning and the Environment
    Khalil, Kathayoon
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 2012, 43 (01): : 68 - 69
  • [2] Free-choice and semi free-choice feeding systems for laying hens
    Sakomura, NK
    daSilva, R
    Moreno, SQ
    Malheiros, EB
    Araujo, WA
    Seixas, JRC
    REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1997, 26 (02): : 343 - 349
  • [3] The contribution of free-choice learning to public understanding of science
    Falk, JH
    INTERCIENCIA, 2002, 27 (02) : 62 - 65
  • [4] Adults' learning about science in free-choice settings
    Rennie, Leonie J.
    Williams, Gina F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2006, 28 (08) : 871 - 893
  • [5] Peculiarities of rat learning under free-choice conditions
    Nikolskaya, KA
    Khonicheva, NM
    ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 1999, 49 (03) : 436 - 445
  • [6] A Free-Choice Social Learning Network for Computational Thinking
    Jamil, Hasan M.
    2018 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT 2018), 2018, : 69 - 71
  • [7] THE OR OF FREE-CHOICE PERMISSION
    JENNINGS, RE
    TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 1994, 13 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [8] Free-Choice Family Learning Experiences at Telescope Observing Events
    Wenger, Matthew C.
    Carter, Kathy
    Harris, Christopher J.
    EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE: MAKING CONNECTIONS IN EDUCATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH, 2011, 443 : 349 - +
  • [9] AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF LATENT LEARNING IN A RELATIVELY FREE-CHOICE SITUATION
    SHAW, ME
    WATERS, RH
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1950, 77 (02): : 283 - 292
  • [10] The Righteous Among the Nations of the World: An Exploration of Free-Choice Learning
    Biniecki, Susan M. Yelich
    Donley, Sarah
    SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):