Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in athletes using a cortical button suspension technique

被引:15
|
作者
Myeroff, Chad [1 ]
Brock, J. Logan [1 ]
Huffman, G. Russell [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Orthopaed, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction; Tommy John; cortical button suspension; UCL; thrower; elbow instability; docking technique; MUSCLE-SPLITTING APPROACH; 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; DOCKING TECHNIQUE; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; ELBOW; FIXATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.009
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A variety of techniques currently exist for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction in symptomatic overhead athletes. all with the potential complication of fracture about the humeral or ulnar tunnels. Far cortical button fixation is a reproducible, biomechanically attractive option; however, no clinical series has been published on this technique to date. This study reports the clinical outcomes. with minimum 2-year follow-up, of a dual far cortical button suspension technique for UCL reconstruction in athletes. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was performed of 23 consecutive athletes who underwent UCL reconstruction with the use of ulnar and humeral-sided far cortical button fixation with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Data were collected from electronic medical records and patient telephone calls. The primary outcome was return to sport. Secondary outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm. Shoulder and Hand score. range of motion. and complications. Results: We included 23 athletes with a mean follow-up of 47.2 months (range, 24-81 months). Autograft was used in 22 patients (16 palmaris. 6 gracilis, 1 semitendinosus, and 1 gracilis allograft). Overall, 82.6% (19 of 23) of patients returned to sport. At final follow-up, the average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 3.8, and range of motion averaged 0 degrees to 140 degrees, with 87% (20 of 23) of patients achieving full motion. The visual analog scale score improved from 3.8 preoperatively to 0.2 at the final follow-up (P < .0001). There was 1 reconstruction failure. Conclusions: The humeral and ulnar far cortical button suspension technique provides a new UCL fixation option with theoretically lower concern for tunnel fracture and with predictable return to sport and good functional outcomes. (C) 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1366 / 1372
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-Term Results of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Throwing Athletes Based on a Hybrid Technique
    Hechtman, Keith S.
    Zvijac, John E.
    Wells, Matt E.
    Botto-van Bemden, Angie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02): : 342 - 347
  • [22] A Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using a Novel Technique for Ulnar-Sided Fixation
    Morgan, Robert J.
    Starman, James S.
    Habet, Nahir A.
    Peindl, Richard D.
    Bankston, Larry S., Jr.
    D'Alessandro, Donald D.
    Connor, Patrick M.
    Fleischli, James E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (07): : 1448 - 1455
  • [23] REHABILITATION FOLLOWING ULNAR COLLATERAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION IN OVERHEAD-THROWING ATHLETES
    Bogdanov, Jacob M.
    Bolia, Ioanna K.
    Benvegnu, Neilen
    Michener, Lori A.
    Weber, Alexander E.
    Petrigliano, Frank A.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [24] The outcome of elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in overhead athletes - A systematic review
    Vitale, Mark A.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (06): : 1193 - 1205
  • [25] Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Bisuspensory Fixation A Biomechanical Comparison With the Docking Technique
    Jackson, Timothy J.
    Adamson, Gregory J.
    Peterson, Alexander
    Patton, John
    McGarry, Michelle H.
    Lee, Thay Q.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (05): : 1158 - 1164
  • [26] Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Bruce, Jeremy R.
    ElAttrache, Neal S.
    Andrews, James R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2018, 26 (11) : 377 - 385
  • [27] Modified Jobe Approach With Docking Technique for Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Kaplan, Daniel J.
    Glait, Sergio A.
    Ryan, William E., Jr.
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2016, 5 (06): : E1321 - E1326
  • [28] Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: Surgical Indications and Reconstruction Technique
    Fu, Michael C.
    Camp, Christopher L.
    Aitchek, David W.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 25 (04) : 310 - 314
  • [29] Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in athletes: Muscle-splitting approach without transposition of the ulnar nerve
    Thompson, WH
    Jobe, FW
    Yocum, LA
    Pink, MM
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (02) : 152 - 157
  • [30] Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using the ToggleLoc With ZipLoop for Ulnar Side Fixation
    Starman, James S.
    Morgan, Robert J.
    Fleischli, James E.
    D'Alessandro, Donald F.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 33 (05) : 312 - 316