The factors related to carbon dioxide effluxes and production in the soil profiles of rain-fed maize fields

被引:25
|
作者
Nan, Weige [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Yue, Shanchao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Shiqing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Haizhou [3 ]
Shen, Yufang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon dioxide; Concentration gradient; Fertilization; Season; Cumulative amount; NITROUS-OXIDE PRODUCTION; CO2; PRODUCTION; WATER-CONTENT; TEMPERATE FOREST; GAS DIFFUSIVITY; LAND-USE; N2O; RESPIRATION; EMISSIONS; FLUXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.032
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
We assessed soil carbon dioxide (CO2) production and transport in high-yield fields and confirmed the main sources and main driving factors of CO2 at different soil depths. Our experiments were performed at the Changwu ecological station, and we utilized a 3-year-old fertility experiment to study the production and effluxes of CO2 within soil profiles. Soil CO2 efflux rates were computed by the concentration gradient method, where CO2 concentrations were measured using flame ionization detector (FID) from situ gas samplers. The results showed that the cumulative production and effluxes of CO2 in the soil decreased with depth; most of CO2 soil production and effluxes occurred in the surface soil (0-15 cm), where the cumulative production and effluxes of CO2 accounted for 723% and 76.3% of the total amounts in the soil profile (0-100 cm), respectively. Higher efflux rates were observed with high production rates from the sixth-leaf stage (V6) to the silking stage (R1), which is a period of rapid maize growth and soil water stress. During that period, mean cumulative effluxes accounted for 52-57% of the annual effluxes. The application of nitrogen fertilizer strongly improved plant growth and grain yield and slightly promoted CO2 production and effluxes. However, nitrogen fertilizer application did not affect the productive contribution rate, i.e., the contribution rate of CO2 production in each soil layer to the entire profile (% of total), which revealed that the production and effluxes of CO2 responded weakly to nitrogen fertilizer. The integrated application of manure and nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased the production and effluxes of CO2 within the soil profiles and significantly improved the productive contribution rates of CO2 in the topsoil. In addition, manure application promoted much greater soil CO2 production throughout the observation period, so the contribution from manure was greater than that from nitrogen fertilizer. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 187
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stress-resilient maize hybrid adoption factors and impact: Evidence from rain-fed agroecologies of Karnataka state, India
    Kulkarni, Atul P.
    Kuchanur, Prakash H.
    Satihal, Dayanand G.
    Zaidi, P. H.
    Rahut, Dil Bahadur
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [32] The influence of nitrogen fertiliser rate and crop rotation on soil methane flux in rain-fed potato fields in Wuchuan County, China
    Wang, Liwei
    Pan, Zhihua
    Xu, Hui
    Wang, Cheng
    Gao, Lin
    Zhao, Peiyi
    Dong, Zhiqiang
    Zhang, Jingting
    Cui, Guohui
    Wang, Sen
    Han, Guolin
    Zhao, Hui
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 537 : 93 - 99
  • [33] Long-term no tillage increased soil organic carbon content of rain-fed cereal systems in a Mediterranean area
    De Sanctis, Giacomo
    Roggero, Pier Paolo
    Seddaiu, Giovanna
    Orsini, Roberto
    Porter, Cheryl H.
    Jones, James W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2012, 40 : 18 - 27
  • [34] Impact of application interval on the control of foliar and soil-borne diseases of peanut in a rain-fed production system in Alabama
    Campbell, H. L.
    Hagan, A. K.
    Bowen, K. L.
    Wells, L. W.
    Pegues, M. D.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 96 (06) : S19 - S19
  • [35] Greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration and crop yields in a rain-fed rice field with crop rotation management
    Cha-un, Nittaya
    Chidthaisong, Amnat
    Yagi, Kazuyuki
    Sudo, Shigeto
    Towprayoon, Sirintornthep
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 237 : 109 - 120
  • [36] Long-term effects of potassium fertilization on yield, efficiency, and soil fertility status in a rain-fed maize system in northeast China
    Qiu, Shaojun
    Xie, Jiagui
    Zhao, Shicheng
    Xu, Xinpeng
    Hou, Yunpeng
    Wang, Xiufang
    Zhou, Wei
    He, Ping
    Johnston, Adrian M.
    Christie, Peter
    Jin, Jiyun
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 163 : 1 - 9
  • [37] N2O emission characteristics and its affecting factors in rain-fed potato fields in Wuchuan County, China
    Wang, Liwei
    Wang, Cheng
    Pan, Zhihua
    Xu, Hui
    Gao, Lin
    Zhao, Peiyi
    Dong, Zhiqiang
    Zhang, Jingting
    Cui, Guohui
    Wang, Sen
    Han, Guolin
    Zhao, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2017, 61 (05) : 911 - 919
  • [38] N2O emission characteristics and its affecting factors in rain-fed potato fields in Wuchuan County, China
    Liwei Wang
    Cheng Wang
    Zhihua Pan
    Hui Xu
    Lin Gao
    Peiyi Zhao
    Zhiqiang Dong
    Jingting Zhang
    Guohui Cui
    Sen Wang
    Guolin Han
    hui Zhao
    International Journal of Biometeorology, 2017, 61 : 911 - 919
  • [39] Immediate and residual-effects of sole and intercropped grain legumes in maize production systems under rain-fed conditions of Northern Tanzania
    Mugi-Ngenga, E.
    Bastiaans, L.
    Anten, N. P. R.
    Zingore, S.
    Giller, K. E.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2022, 287
  • [40] Modeling gross primary production of irrigated and rain-fed maize using MODIS imagery and CO2 flux tower data
    Kalfas, Joshua L.
    Xiao, Xiangming
    Vanegas, Diana X.
    Verma, Shashi B.
    Suyker, Andrew E.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2011, 151 (12) : 1514 - 1528