Argumentation Frameworks with Justified Attacks

被引:0
|
作者
Dyrkolbotn, Sjur K. [1 ]
Pedersen, Truls [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Philosophy & Religious Studies, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Informat Sci & Media Studies, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
After Dung's semina lpaper on argumentation frameworks, the relation of attack between arguments has occupied pride of place in formal argumentation theory. Yet, very little attention has been devoted to modelling argumentation about attack relations. Argumentation of this kind is encountered in many situations, especially when arguers discuss there levance of each other's arguments.To model it, we introduce argumentation frameworks with justified attacks, where an attack succeeds only if one of its justification arguments are accepted. The main technical result is are presentation theorem, showing how to translate argumentation framework swith justified attacks into standard argumentation frameworks with dummy arguments whose combinatorial properties encode the support-function of attack justifications.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 63
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks
    Modgil, S.
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2006, 144 : 297 - 308
  • [32] On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
    Amgoud, L.
    Cayrol, C.
    Lagasquie-Schiex, M. C.
    Livet, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (10) : 1062 - 1093
  • [33] Argumentation Frameworks with Necessities
    Nouioua, Farid
    Risch, Vincent
    SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 6929 : 163 - 176
  • [34] Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks with preferences: Partial orders and collective attacks
    Arieli, Ofer
    Heyninck, Jesse
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2025, 178
  • [36] Handling ignorance in argumentation: Semantics of partial argumentation frameworks
    Cayrol, C.
    Devred, C.
    Lagasquie-Schiex, M. C.
    SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4724 : 259 - +
  • [37] A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks
    Serena Villata
    Guido Boella
    Dov M. Gabbay
    Leendert van der Torre
    Joris Hulstijn
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 66 : 199 - 230
  • [38] A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks
    Villata, Serena
    Boella, Guido
    Gabbay, Dov M.
    van der Torre, Leendert
    Hulstijn, Joris
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 66 (1-4) : 199 - 230
  • [39] Labeled bipolar argumentation frameworks
    Escanuela Gonzalez M.G.
    Budan M.C.D.
    Simari G.I.
    Simari G.R.
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2021, 70 : 1557 - 1636
  • [40] Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
    Baumeister, Dorothea
    Jarvisalo, Matti
    Neugebauer, Daniel
    Niskanen, Andreas
    Rothe, Joerg
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 295