Argumentation Frameworks with Justified Attacks

被引:0
|
作者
Dyrkolbotn, Sjur K. [1 ]
Pedersen, Truls [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Philosophy & Religious Studies, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bergen, Dept Informat Sci & Media Studies, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
After Dung's semina lpaper on argumentation frameworks, the relation of attack between arguments has occupied pride of place in formal argumentation theory. Yet, very little attention has been devoted to modelling argumentation about attack relations. Argumentation of this kind is encountered in many situations, especially when arguers discuss there levance of each other's arguments.To model it, we introduce argumentation frameworks with justified attacks, where an attack succeeds only if one of its justification arguments are accepted. The main technical result is are presentation theorem, showing how to translate argumentation framework swith justified attacks into standard argumentation frameworks with dummy arguments whose combinatorial properties encode the support-function of attack justifications.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 63
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
    C. Cayrol
    J. Fandinno
    L. Fariñas del Cerro
    M.-C. Lagasquie-Schiex
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 89 : 53 - 101
  • [2] Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
    Baroni, Pietro
    Cerutti, Federico
    Giacomin, Massimiliano
    Guida, Giovanni
    SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5590 : 83 - 94
  • [3] Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
    Cayrol, C.
    Fandinno, J.
    del Cerro, L. Farinas
    Lagasquie-Schiex, M-C
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 89 (1-2) : 53 - 101
  • [4] Treewidth for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks
    Dvorak, Wolfgang
    Koenig, Matthias
    Woltran, Stefan
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, COMMA 2022, 2022, 353 : 140 - 151
  • [5] JOINT ATTACKS AND ACCRUAL IN ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS
    Bikakis, Antonis
    Cohen, Andrea
    Dvorak, Wolfgang
    Flouris, Giorgos
    Parsons, Simon
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LOGICS-IFCOLOG JOURNAL OF LOGICS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2021, 8 (06): : 1437 - 1501
  • [6] Joint attacks and accrual in argumentation frameworks
    Bikakis, Antonis
    Cohen, Andrea
    Dvorák, Wolfgang
    Flouris, Giorgos
    Parsons, Simon
    1600, College Publications (08): : 1437 - 1501
  • [7] Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks
    Dvorak, Wolfgang
    Rapberger, Anna
    Woltran, Stefan
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, KI 2019, 2019, 11793 : 131 - 145
  • [8] Principles and their Computational Consequences for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks
    Dvořák W.
    König M.
    Ulbricht M.
    Woltran S.
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2024, 79 : 69 - 136
  • [9] Principles and their Computational Consequences for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks
    Dvorak, Wolfgang
    Koenig, Matthias
    Ulbricht, Markus
    Woltran, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2024, 79 : 69 - 136
  • [10] Argumentation Frameworks with Recursive Attacks and Evidence-Based Supports
    Cayrol, Claudette
    Fandinno, Jorge
    del Cerro, Luis Farinas
    Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine
    FOUNDATIONS OF INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS, FOIKS 2018, 2018, 10833 : 150 - 169