Carcass decontamination methods in slaughterhouses: a review

被引:0
|
作者
Milios, K. [1 ]
Drosinos, E. H. [2 ]
Zoiopoulos, P. E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Reg Adm Western Greece, Vet Serv, Patras 26110, Greece
[2] Agr Univ Athens, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Lab Food Qual Control & Hyg, GR-11855 Athens, Greece
[3] Univ Ioannina, Sch Management Nat Resources & Enterprises, Lab Anim Sci, Agrinion, Greece
来源
JOURNAL OF THE HELLENIC VETERINARY MEDICAL SOCIETY | 2014年 / 65卷 / 02期
关键词
carcass decontamination; intervention and non-intervention methods; slaughterhouse hygiene; ESCHERICHIA-COLI O157-H7; MULTIPLE-SEQUENTIAL INTERVENTIONS; BEEF CARCASSES; ANTIMICROBIAL INTERVENTIONS; MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY; SALMONELLA-TYPHIMURIUM; PATHOGENIC BACTERIA; PEROXYACETIC ACID; LACTIC-ACID; ACETIC-ACID;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
European Union legislation approach to meat safety assurance advocates use of strict preventive hygiene measures and procedures to overcome threats by pathogens. Therefore, there is no need for carcass decontamination at the last stage of slaughtering process, using intervention methods. In contrast, the United States permit and regulate intervention decontamination methods. Generally, a HACCP system may use intervention treatments. These may be based solely on a non-intervention system or use a combination of both. Interventions have the advantage of achieving a consistent reduction in bacterial contamination and require less manual input, but on the other hand, may also lead to carcass discolouration, produce large quantities of waste water and be relatively expensive. Moreover, intervention methods could constitute a means of concealing poor hygiene conditions during slaughtering or, even more, their residues could be a potential hazard for food safety. Non-intervention systems have the advantages of being relatively inexpensive, easy to implement and more preventive. However, these systems rely heavily on human effort and the possibility for error is considerably higher than the intervention systems. There are many carcass decontamination methods, as described in the relevant literature and used in slaughterhouses worldwide, such as: (i) cold/warm water washing, (ii) hot water washing, (iii) steam vacuuming, (iv) steam pasteurization, (v) irradiation, (vi) organic acid application, (vii) combination of organic acid application with other decontamination treatments and (viii) other chemical treatments. Aim of this review is to provide information on the relevant literature, as well as describe and comment on the questions raised.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 78
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
    Probst, Livia Fernandes
    Guerrero, Ana Tereza Gomes
    de Queiroz Cardoso, Andreia Insabralde
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    Croda, Mariana Garcia
    Venturini, James
    de Camargo Fonseca, Maria Cristina
    Miranda Paniago, Anamaria Mello
    Maia Barreto, Jorge Otavio
    do Vale Leone de Oliveira, Sandra Maria
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [42] Mask decontamination methods (model N95) for respiratory protection: a rapid review
    Livia Fernandes Probst
    Ana Tereza Gomes Guerrero
    Andréia Insabralde de Queiroz Cardoso
    Antonio Jose Grande
    Mariana Garcia Croda
    James Venturini
    Maria Cristina de Camargo Fonseca
    Anamaria Mello Miranda Paniago
    Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
    Sandra Maria do Vale Leone de Oliveira
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [43] Effectiveness of biological decontamination methods to reduce the toxic effects of mycotoxins in animal models: a review
    Freire, Lucas Gabriel Dionisio
    Ali, Sher
    De Oliveira, Carlos Augusto Fernandes
    TOXIN REVIEWS, 2024, 43 (04) : 572 - 590
  • [44] FRENCH METHODS FOR CARCASS TESTING
    DELPECH, P
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 1972, 28 (04) : 448 - &
  • [45] Assessment of beef carcass contamination with Salmonella and E. coli O 157 in slaughterhouses in Bishoftu, Ethiopia
    Fanta D. Gutema
    Reta D. Abdi
    Getahun E. Agga
    Seyoum Firew
    Geertrui Rasschaert
    Wesley Mattheus
    Florence Crombe
    Luc Duchateau
    Sarah Gabriël
    Lieven De Zutter
    International Journal of Food Contamination, 8 (1):
  • [46] RADIOCHEMICAL METHODS EMPLOYED IN NUCLEAR DECONTAMINATION
    LEVENTHAL, L
    KHARKAR, D
    WESSMAN, R
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1981, 38 (JUN): : 250 - 251
  • [47] NEW TRENDS IN INTERNAL DECONTAMINATION METHODS
    CATSCH, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY AND RELATED STUDIES IN PHYSICS CHEMISTRY AND MEDICINE, 1963, 6 (04): : 398 - 399
  • [48] Physical Methods for the Decontamination of Meat Surfaces
    Thiemo Albert
    Peggy G. Braun
    Jasem Saffaf
    Claudia Wiacek
    Current Clinical Microbiology Reports, 2021, 8 : 9 - 20
  • [49] Survey of Nasopharyngoscope Decontamination Methods in Canada
    Brake, Maria K.
    Lee, Boyd S.
    Savoury, Loren
    Cavanagh, Jonathan P.
    Burrage, Kenneth J.
    Smith, Thomas J.
    Brown, Timothy F. E.
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 39 (06): : 714 - 722
  • [50] SKIN DECONTAMINATION - A COMPARISON OF 4 METHODS
    MERRICK, MV
    SIMPSON, JD
    LIDDELL, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1982, 55 (652): : 317 - 318