Hedonic Contrast Effects Are Larger When Comparisons Are Social

被引:25
|
作者
Morewedge, Carey K. [1 ]
Zhu, Meng [2 ]
Buechel, Eva C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Questrom Sch Business, Mkt, 595 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Carey Business Sch, Mkt, 100 Int Dr, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Mkt, 701 Exposition Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
social comparison; hedonic contrast effects; social attention; counterfactual thinking; affect; COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING; EMOTIONAL-REACTIONS; INCOME INEQUALITY; IMPACT BIAS; CONSEQUENCES; ATTENTION; DIRECTION; DECISION; SELF; LESS;
D O I
10.1093/jcr/ucy070
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A hedonic contrast effect occurs when comparing a stimulus to its alternatives makes it better or worse. We find that counterfactual comparisons induce larger hedonic contrast effects when they are also social comparisons. Hedonic contrast effects influence happiness with a food or wage more when another person receives its counterfactual alternative than when no person receives its counterfactual alternative. Social attention, the propensity to attend to the experiences of other people, underlies the larger hedonic contrast effects induced by social comparisons. People pay more attention to counterfactual alternatives when they are also social comparison standards, and this difference in the allocation of attention mediates the larger hedonic contrast effects that social counterfactual comparisons induce. Reducing attentional resources with cognitive load or time pressure reduces the impact of social counterfactual comparisons, and drawing attention to nonsocial counterfactual comparisons increases their impact. Social attention makes comparisons stronger when they are social.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 306
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effects of tool comparisons when estimating the likelihood of task success
    Li, Shuqi
    Miller, Jane E.
    Stuart, Jillian O'Rourke
    Jules, Sean J.
    Scherer, Aaron M.
    Smith, Andrew R.
    Windschitl, Paul D.
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2021, 16 (01): : 165 - 200
  • [32] WHEN SELECTIVE ADAPTATION AND CONTRAST EFFECTS ARE DISTINCT - REPLY
    SAWUSCH, JR
    MULLENNIX, JW
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1985, 11 (02) : 242 - 250
  • [33] When expertise backfires: Contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion
    Bohner, G
    Ruder, M
    Erb, HP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 41 : 495 - 519
  • [34] Examination of effects on situational appropriateness when co-elicited with hedonic product responses
    Jaeger, Sara R.
    Vidal, Leticia
    Swaney-Stueve, Marianne
    Xia, Yixun
    Ares, Gaston
    JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2020, 35 (06)
  • [35] When Do Hedonic and Eudaimonic Orientations Lead to Happiness? Moderating Effects of Orientation Priority
    Chen, Hezhi
    Zeng, Zhijia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (18)
  • [36] The effects of user comments on hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experiences when watching online videos
    Moller, A. Marthe
    Kuhne, Rinaldo
    COMMUNICATIONS-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2019, 44 (04): : 427 - 446
  • [37] THE EFFECT OF DIRECTION, SELF-RELEVANCE, AND FOCUS OF SOCIAL COMPARISONS ON SELF-EVALUATION: INTERPRETATION VIA ASSIMILATION AND CONTRAST EFFECTS
    Tsai, Chia-Ching
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2010, 106 (02) : 359 - 373
  • [38] WHEN COMPARISONS ARISE
    GILBERT, DT
    GIESLER, RB
    MORRIS, KA
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 69 (02) : 227 - 236
  • [39] Social comparisons of children with and without learning disabilities when evaluating physical competence
    Shapiro, DR
    Ulrich, DA
    ADAPTED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUARTERLY, 2001, 18 (03) : 273 - 288
  • [40] When Misery Avoids Company: Selective Social Comparisons to Photographic Online Profiles
    Johnson, Benjamin K.
    Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia
    HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (01) : 54 - 75