Radical Prostatectomy After Previous Prostate Surgery: Effects on Surgical Difficulty and Pathologic Outcomes

被引:19
|
作者
Yazici, Sertac [1 ]
Inci, Kubilay [1 ]
Yuksel, Serdar [1 ]
Bilen, Cenk Yucel [1 ]
Ozen, Haluk [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; ANASTOMOTIC STRICTURES; RISK-FACTORS; RESECTION; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the surgical difficulty and pathologic outcomes of patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery. METHODS A total of 45 patients with previous prostate surgery underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The surgical difficulty and pathologic Outcomes for this group of patients (group 1) were compared with those for 50 consecutive patients who had undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy as their only prostatic Surgery (group 2). The estimated blood loss and operative time were accepted as surrogates for surgical difficulty. Surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion, and extracapsular extension were evaluated to determine the pathologic outcomes. Late complications, including urinary incontinence and anastomotic stricture, were also assessed. RESULTS Radical prostatectomy was technically more challenging in the patients after previous prostate Surgery compared with surgery-naive patients, with significantly more estimated blood loss (P < .05) and a longer operative time (P < .001). A unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing procedure was per-formed in only 9 patients in group I but in 35 patients in group 2, resulting in tow potency rates in group 1. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer in group 1. The continence rate was significantly greater in surgery-naive patients. No difference was found between the groups with regard to the rate of seminal vesical invasion, extracapsular extension, and surgical margin status. CONCLUSIONS Although radical retropubic prostatectomy is technically more difficult after previous prostate surgery, it can be performed safely with no difference in pathologic outcomes from those seen in patients with no history of prostate surgery. UROLOGY 73: 856-859, 2009. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 859
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate
    Jaffe, Jamison
    Stakhovsky, Oleksandr
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Barret, Eric
    Vallancien, Guy
    Rozet, Francois
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (02): : 483 - 487
  • [32] Surgical outcomes in men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after a transurethral resection of the prostate
    Jaffe, Jamison S.
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Barret, Eric
    Vallancien, Guy
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Rozet, Francois
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 187 - 187
  • [33] EFFECTS OF BODY MASS INDEX AND PROSTATE WEIGHT ON THE SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Jeong, J.
    Choi, E. Y.
    Kang, D.
    Johnson, K.
    Kim, I. Y.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A249 - A249
  • [34] Outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men receiving previous pelvic radiation for non-prostate malignancies
    Masterson, Timothy A.
    Wedmid, Alexei
    Sandhu, Jaspreet S.
    Eastham, James A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (04) : 482 - 485
  • [35] Pathologic outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer after delayed radical prostatectomy in the United States
    Weiner, Adam B.
    Patel, Sanjay G.
    Eggener, Scott E.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (04) : 164.e11 - 164.e17
  • [36] Robotic radical prostatectomy following previous transurethral prostate surgery: Lessons learned
    Eun, Daniel
    Boris, Ronald
    Muhletaler, Fred
    Baliga, Mithun
    Shrivastava, Alok
    Ogunfidimi, Folusho
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 209 - 210
  • [37] Surgical approach and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy
    Caillet, K.
    Lipsker, A.
    Alezra, E.
    De Sousa, P.
    Pignot, G.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2017, 27 (05): : 283 - 296
  • [38] PATHOLOGIC OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH NEGATIVE MRI UNDERGOING PROSTATE BIOPSY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Oishi, Masakatsu
    Shin, Toshitaka
    Ashrafi, Akbar
    Ohe, Chisato
    Ghodoussipour, Saum
    Lin-Brande, Michael
    Winter, Matthew
    Medina, Luis
    Margaryan, Tigran
    Palmer, Suzanne
    Aron, Manju
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Gill, Inderbir
    Abreu, Andre
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E768 - E768
  • [39] The influence of prostate size on perioperative, pathologic and continence outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Koi, Philip
    Milhoua, Paul
    Knoll, Abraham
    Ghavamian, Reza
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A156 - A156
  • [40] Time from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy does not impact surgical difficulty or efficacy
    Eggener, SE
    Yossepowitch, O
    Seno, A
    Vickers, AJ
    Scardino, PT
    Eastham, JA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 516 - 516