Ambiguity and perceived coordination in a global game

被引:1
|
作者
Laskar, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, Paris Sch Econ, UMR 8545, Paris, France
关键词
Global game; Ambiguity; Coordination; Equilibrium selection; Financial crises; FULFILLING CURRENCY ATTACKS; EXPECTED UTILITY; EQUILIBRIUM; PROBABILITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.econlet.2013.12.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In a global game, larger ambiguity is shown to decrease the amount of coordination each player perceives. Consequently, small uncertainty tends to select the Pareto dominated equilibrium of the game without uncertainty. Implications for models of financial crises are drawn. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 320
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social comparison with ambiguity: An investment and consumption game
    Sun, Yuzhe
    Zhang, Shunming
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 230
  • [22] A dynamic game of coalition formation under ambiguity
    Giuseppe De Marco
    Maria Romaniello
    Soft Computing, 2010, 15 : 637 - 644
  • [23] Relationship type, perceived trust, and ambiguity aversion
    Hsin-Hsien Liu
    Jung-Hua Chang
    Marketing Letters, 2017, 28 : 255 - 266
  • [24] Ambiguity on audits and cooperation in a public goods game
    Dai, Zhixin
    Hogarth, Robin M.
    Villeval, Marie Claire
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 74 : 146 - 162
  • [25] A note on the role of ambiguity in a monetary policy game
    Denicolò, V
    MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 1998, 66 (05): : 571 - 580
  • [26] A dynamic game of coalition formation under ambiguity
    De Marco, Giuseppe
    Romaniello, Maria
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 15 (04) : 637 - 644
  • [27] A GLOBAL GAME
    不详
    FORTUNE, 2017, 176 (02) : 36 - 37
  • [28] Tax compliance as a coordination game
    Alm, J
    McKee, M
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2004, 54 (03) : 297 - 312
  • [29] Network Heterogeneity and a Coordination Game
    Tomohiko, Tomohiko
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2015, 35 (04): : 2462 - 2474
  • [30] Value Creation: A Coordination Game
    Stuart, Harborne W., Jr.
    NEGOTIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 27 (02) : 171 - 190