Impact on Prognosis of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:11
|
作者
Gili, Sebastiano [1 ]
D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio [1 ]
Moretti, Claudio [1 ]
Omede, Pierluigi [1 ]
Vilardi, Ilaria [1 ]
Bertaina, Maurizio [1 ]
Zoccai, Giuseppe Biondi [1 ]
Sheiban, Imad [1 ]
Stone, Gregg W. [2 ,3 ]
Gaita, Fiorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Citta Salute & Sci, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Turin, Italy
[2] Columbia Univ Med Ctr, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[3] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
关键词
DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; KINASE-MB ELEVATION; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; UNIVERSAL DEFINITION; TROPONIN ELEVATION; REVASCULARIZATION; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY; DISEASE; CATHETERIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/joic.12143
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Different definitions of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been provided, but their impact on prognosis remains to be determined. Methods: Procedural data from consecutive patients undergoing PCI from 2009 to 2011 were revised to adjudicate diagnosis of periprocedural MI according to CK-MB increase (>3 x URL and >5 x URL), to troponin increase (>3 x 99th percentile URL and >5 x 99th percentile URL) and to recent 2012 Task Force and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) definitions. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was the primary end-point. Results: Seven hundred twelve patients were enrolled; after 771 days, 115 (16.7%) patients experienced MACE. One hundred ninety patients were diagnosed with a periprocedural MI defined as elevation of troponin >5 x 99th percentile of URL. When adjudicating 2012 Task Force definition on these patients, 46 were excluded and 1.4% of them experienced a MACE and 0.3% died, while among 144 with periprocedural MI, 2.9% reported a MACE and 1.3% died. After appraisal of SCAI definition, 176 patients were excluded, 3.8% of them with a MACE and 1.4% died, and for those with periprocedural MI, 0.5% experienced a MACE and 0.1% died. Similar low performance was appraised after reclassification of patients from more than 3 of upper limit of CK-MB and of troponin. At multivariate analysis, none of these definitions related to adverse events. Conclusion: Periprocedural MI represents a frequent complication for patients undergoing PCI. All present definitions share a still not satisfactory discrimination between patients with and without adverse events at follow-up, stressing the need for more accurate definitions.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 490
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preprocedure inflammatory state predicts periprocedural myocardial infarction after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: An EPIC substudy
    Aronow, HD
    Quinn, MJ
    Gurm, HS
    Lauer, MS
    Brennan, DM
    Topol, EJ
    Lincoff, AM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 17A - 17A
  • [32] Periprocedural myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality: a meta-analysis
    Paolucci, Luca
    Mangiacapra, Fabio
    Sergio, Sara
    Nusca, Annunziata
    Briguori, Carlo
    Barbato, Emanuele
    Ussia, Gian Paolo
    Grigioni, Francesco
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45 (33) : 3018 - 3027
  • [33] Impact of nutritional status on prognosis in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Daisuke Kanda
    Yoshiyuki Ikeda
    Takuro Takumi
    Akihiro Tokushige
    Takeshi Sonoda
    Ryo Arikawa
    Kazuhiro Anzaki
    Ippei Kosedo
    Mitsuru Ohishi
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 22
  • [34] Impact of nutritional status on prognosis in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Kanda, Daisuke
    Ikeda, Yoshiyuki
    Takumi, Takuro
    Tokushige, Akihiro
    Sonoda, Takeshi
    Arikawa, Ryo
    Anzaki, Kazuhiro
    Kosedo, Ippei
    Ohishi, Mitsuru
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [35] Frequency and outcomes of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients with chronic coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Ueki, Yasushi
    Raber, Lorenz
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 37 (06) : 488 - 494
  • [36] The effect of atorvastatin before percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease in periprocedural myocardial infarction
    Lely, P. C. D.
    Yogiarto, M.
    Suryawan, I. G. R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2017, 19 (0E) : E30 - E30
  • [37] Persistent Renal Dysfunction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence, Predictors, and Impact on Prognosis
    Choe, Jeong Cheon
    Cha, Kwang Soo
    Ahn, Jinhee
    Park, Jin Sup
    Lee, Hye Won
    Oh, Jun-Hyok
    Kim, Jeong Su
    Choi, Jung Hyun
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Lee, Han Cheol
    Kim, June Hong
    Chun, Kook Jin
    Hong, Taek Jong
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    ANGIOLOGY, 2017, 68 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [38] A nationwide study on prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in persons with and without familial myocardial infarction
    Voegg, R. O. B.
    Simonsen, J.
    Ranthe, M. F.
    Davidsen, R. B.
    Zwisler, A. D.
    Kappelgaard, L. M.
    Bundgaard, H.
    Melbye, M.
    Boyd, H. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 981 - 982
  • [39] IMPACT OF THROMBOCYTOPENIA ON PROGNOSIS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Raphael, Claire E.
    Spoon, Daniel
    Bell, Malcolm
    Psaltis, Peter J.
    Kidd, Stephen
    Loh, Shu Xian
    Lennon, Ryan
    Rihal, Charanjit
    Singh, Mandeep
    Gulati, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (13) : 185 - 185
  • [40] MULTIMODALITY CORONARY IMAGING TO PREDICT PERIPROCEDURAL MYOCARDIAL NECROSIS AFTER ELECTIVE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Niida, Takayuki
    Yonetsu, Taishi
    Murai, Tadashi
    Kanaji, Yoshihisa
    Usui, Eisuke
    Hoshino, Masahiro
    Yamaguchi, Masao
    Hada, Masahiro
    Ichijo, Sadamitsu
    Hamaya, Rikuta
    Kanno, Yoshinori
    Kakuta, Tsunekazu
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 303 - 303