Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock

被引:2000
|
作者
Annane, D
Sébille, V
Charpentier, C
Bollaert, PE
François, B
Korach, JM
Capellier, G
Cohen, Y
Azoulay, E
Troché, G
Chaumet-Riffaut, P
Bellissant, E
机构
[1] Univ Paris 05, Fac Med Paris Ouest, Hop Raymond Poincare, Serv Reanimat Med, F-92380 Garches, France
[2] Univ Rennes 1, Hop Pontchaillou, Unite Pharmacol Clin, Serv Pharmacol, Rennes, France
[3] Hop Cent, Serv Reanimat Chirurg, Nancy, France
[4] Hop Cent, Serv Reanimat Med, Nancy, France
[5] Hop Dupuytren, Serv Reanimat Polyvalente, Limoges, France
[6] Ctr Hosp, Serv Reanimat Polyvalente, Chalons Sur Marne, France
[7] Hop Jean Minjoz, Serv Reanimat Med, F-25030 Besancon, France
[8] Hop Avicenne, Serv Reanimat Medicochirurg, F-93009 Bobigny, France
[9] Hop St Louis, Serv Reanimat Med, Paris, France
[10] Hop St Louis, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Delegat Rech Clin, Paris, France
[11] Hop Antoine Beclere, Serv Reanimat Chirurg, Clamart, France
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.288.7.862
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Septic shock maybe associated with relative adrenal insufficiency. Thus, a replacement therapy of low doses of corticosteroids has been proposed to treat septic shock. Objective To assess whether low doses of corticosteroids improve 28-day survival in patients with septic shock and relative adrenal insufficiency. Design and Setting Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial performed in 19 intensive care units in France from October 9, 1995, to February 23, 1999. Patients Three hundred adult patients who fulfilled usual criteria for septic shock were enrolled after undergoing a short corticotropin test. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive either hydrocortisone (50-mg intravenous bolus every 6 hours) and fludrocortisone (50-mug tablet once daily) (n=151) or matching placebos (n=149) for 7 days. Main Outcome Measure Twenty-eight-day survival distribution in patients with relative adrenal insufficiency (nonresponders to the corticotropin test). Results One patient from the corticosteroid group was excluded from analyses because of consent withdrawal. There Were 229 nonresponders to the corticotropin test (placebo, 115; corticosteroids, 114) and 70 responders to the corticotropin test (placebo, 34; corticosteroids, 36). In nonresponders, there were 73 deaths (63%) in the placebo group and 60 deaths (53%) in the corticosteroid group (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.95; P=.02). Vasopressor therapy was withdrawn within 28 days in 46 patients (40%) in the placebo group and in 65 patients (57%) in the corticosteroid group (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.84; P=.001). There was no significant difference between groups in responders. Adverse events rates were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusion In our trial, a 7-day treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone significantly reduced the risk of death in patients with septic shock and relative adrenal insufficiency without increasing adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 871
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hydrocortisone did not reduce mortality at 90 days in patients with septic shock
    Duran, Brent A.
    Badgett, Robert G.
    Simpson, Steven Q.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 168 (12) : JC69 - JC69
  • [32] Is hydrocortisone an effective treatment for septic shock?
    Cooper, Mark S.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2008, 4 (07): : 368 - 369
  • [33] Is hydrocortisone an effective treatment for septic shock?
    Mark S Cooper
    Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2008, 4 : 368 - 369
  • [34] Effect of low doses of hydrocortisone in patient with septic shock and relative adrenal insufficiency: 3 days versus 7 days treatment.
    Huh, Lin Won
    Lim, Chae-Man
    Koh, Younsuck
    Hong, Sang-Bum
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (12) : A101 - A101
  • [35] Evaluation of the role of hydrocortisone either alone or combined with fludrocortisone in the outcome of septic shock in adults
    Heba A. Labib
    Ali I. Hassan
    Ayman M. Kamaly
    Sherif S. Wahba
    Mona A. Ammar
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14
  • [36] Evaluation of the role of hydrocortisone either alone or combined with fludrocortisone in the outcome of septic shock in adults
    Labib, Heba A.
    Hassan, Ali, I
    Kamaly, Ayman M.
    Wahba, Sherif S.
    Ammar, Mona A.
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [37] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FLUDROCORTISONE PLUS HYDROCORTISONE VS HYDROCORTISONE ALONE OR PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Navalha, Denilsa
    Aljazeeri, Jafar
    Roberson, Manuel Villegas
    Pareja-Plata, Jose
    Guillen, Camilo
    Advani, Kavita
    CHEST, 2024, 166 (04) : 2337A - 2337A
  • [38] Should Fludrocortisone be Added to Hydrocortisone in Septic Shock? Probably Yes, Based on Available Evidence
    Bosch, Nicholas A.
    Pereira, Tiago V.
    Teja, Bijan
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (04) : 678 - 682
  • [39] Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock
    Sprung, Charles L.
    Annane, Djillali
    Keh, Didier
    Moreno, Rui
    Singer, Mervyn
    Freivogel, Klaus
    Weiss, Yoram G.
    Benbenishty, Julie
    Kalenka, Armin
    Forst, Helmuth
    Laterre, Pierre-Francois
    Reinhart, Konrad
    Cuthbertson, Brian H.
    Payen, Didier
    Briegel, Josef
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (02): : 111 - 124
  • [40] EFFECT OF HYDROCORTISONE VERSUS METHYLPREDNISOLONE IN ONCOLOGY PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK
    McDonnell, Emily
    Collins, Reagan
    Hernandez, Mike
    Brown, Anne Rain
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48