Quantifying Australia's life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for new homes

被引:22
|
作者
Schmidt, Monique [1 ]
Crawford, Robert H. [1 ]
Warren-Myers, Georgia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Australia; Life cycle analysis; Greenhouse gas emissions; Housing; ENERGY; BUILDINGS; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110287
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Australia is going through a significant housing boom with approximately 200,000 new homes built each year; and significantly more are required on an annual basis to accommodate the estimated population growth of almost 36 million by 2050. The effects of climate change are increasingly being felt and respon-sive action is required for mitigation and adaption, which must include the greenhouse gas (GHG) emis-sion implications of this new residential stock. Mitigation strategies have been predominantly focused on decreasing the operational GHG emissions associated with buildings, leaving the other life cycle stages, such as construction, largely ignored. To achieve national targets, such as zero net emissions by 2050, it is imperative to address GHG emissions mitigation from a life cycle perspective. This study found that based on current building practices one new detached dwelling built today will be responsible for roughly 545 tCO(2)e by 2050. This translates to the need to plant over 8,000 trees to offset these emissions, a figure it is safe to say, most homeowners will not achieve. This study modelled life cycle GHG emissions of all new detached dwellings constructed in Australia for a single year (2019) estimating 39 MtCO(2)e, which increases to 883 MtCO(2)e by 2030 and 3,654 MtCO(2)e by 2050. This is much higher than the current projections for Australia's total emissions by 2030 of 563 MtCO(2)e if a business as usual approach is fol-lowed, and the optimum target of 441 MtCO(2)e to meet emissions targets of 26% less than 2005. The results of this study suggest that housing-related GHG emission are underestimated by 60%, because of the absence of embodied GHG emissions being counted in emission projections. This emphasises that firstly, target and current GHG emission projections fail to consider emissions from a life cycle perspec-tive, and primarily report findings based on operational data, which as this study has shown can lead to a misrepresentation of almost 96% of total life cycle GHG emissions. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revealing the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of materials: The Japanese case
    Dente, Sebastien M. R.
    Aoki-Suzuki, Chika
    Tanaka, Daisuke
    Hashimoto, Seiji
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 133 : 395 - 403
  • [32] A review on the quantification of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions at urban scale
    Ghaemi, Zahra
    Smith, Amanda D.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252
  • [33] Quantifying drivers of variability in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of consumer productsa case study on laundry washing in Europe
    Shahmohammadi, Sadegh
    Steinmann, Zoran
    Clavreul, Julie
    Hendrickx, Hilde
    King, Henry
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (10): : 1940 - 1949
  • [34] The greenhouse gas emissions of power transformers based on life cycle analysis
    Guo, Hong
    Gao, Yuting
    Li, Junhao
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 413 - 419
  • [35] The impact of 'Cash for Clunkers' on greenhouse gas emissions: a life cycle perspective
    Lenski, Shoshannah M.
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    Bolon, Kevin M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 5 (04):
  • [37] Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: A life cycle assessment
    Sonne, Edie
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (04) : 1439 - 1450
  • [38] At the intersection of life cycle assessment and indirect greenhouse gas emissions accounting
    Boakye, Amma Asantewaa Agyei
    Boguski, Terrie
    Cashman, Sarah
    Koffler, Christoph
    Kreuder, Ashley
    Kumar, Manish
    Vipparla, Naveen Kumar
    Peterson, Lisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (04): : 321 - 335
  • [39] Scenario analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Darjeeling tea
    Cichorowski, Georg
    Joa, Bettina
    Hottenroth, Heidi
    Schmidt, Mario
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (04): : 426 - 439
  • [40] Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in: The life cycle of CdTe photovoltaics
    Fthenakis, Vasilis M.
    Kim, Hyung Chul
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS TOOLS FOR GREEN MATERIALS AND PROCESS SELECTION, 2006, 895 : 83 - +