Why group & save? Blood transfusion at low-risk elective caesarean section

被引：4

作者：

Stock, Owen ^{[1
]}

Beckmann, Michael ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Mercy Hosp Women, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia

[2] Mater Res & Mater Mothers Hosp, Womens Hlth Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

[3] Mater Res & Mater Mothers Hosp, Newborn Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia

来源：

AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY | 2014年 / 54卷 / 03期

基金：

澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;

关键词：

birth; blood grouping and cross-matching; blood transfusion; caesarean section; health resources; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; VAGINAL DELIVERY; MULTICENTER; ANEMIA; TERM;

D O I：

10.1111/ajo.12177

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

Women undergoing elective caesarean section (CS) routinely have a group and save ordered as part of their preoperative assessment, whereas women with expected vaginal birth do not. Our aim was therefore to determine the rate of blood transfusion at elective CS compared with vaginal birth in a large Australian maternity hospital. A retrospective cohort study was performed using routinely collected de-identified data of 35477 women, over 4years, who delivered at the Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. After excluding women with established risk factors for transfusion, the likelihood of blood transfusion following elective CS was significantly lower compared to vaginal birth (aOR 0.47 (0.29, 0.77)).

引用

页码：279 / 282

页数：4

共 50 条

[31] Maternal-choice caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth in low-risk primigravid women
Robson, Stephen J.
de Costa, Caroline
Woods, Cindy
Ding, Pauline
Rane, Ajay
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 (04): : 469 - 473
[32] Why do low-risk nulliparous women with a normal sized fetus need emergency caesarean delivery?
Murphy, N.
Burke, N.
Breathnach, F.
Burke, G.
McAuliffe, F.
Morrison, J.
Turner, M.
Dornan, S.
Higgins, J.
Cotter, A.
Geary, M.
Cody, F.
McParland, P.
Mulcahy, C.
Daly, S.
Dicker, P.
Tully, E.
Malone, F.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 11 - 11
[33] Audit of blood transfusion in elective breast cancer surgery - do we need to group and save pre-operatively
Malik, Hassan
Bishop, Hugh
Winstanley, John
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2008, 90 (06) : 472 - 473
[34] Why do primigravida women request an elective caesarean section without medical indication
Samangaya, R.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 96 - 97
[35] Enhanced recovery for obstetric surgery (EROS): an effective and proactive new ethos for managing low-risk elective caesarean sections
Lockley, S.
Demitry, A.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 55 - 55
[36] Elective Repeat Caesarean Section in Low-Risk Women-Economic Evaluation Comparing Births Before vs. After 39 Weeks Gestation in Ontario, Canada
Longo, Christopher J.
Harrold, JoAnn
Dunn, Sandra
Smith, Graeme
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2018, 40 (12) : 1600 - 1607
[37] Maternal age and elective cesarean section in a low-risk population (vol 91, pg 816, 2012)
Herstad, L.
Klungsoyr, K.
Skjaerven, R.
Tanbo, T.
Eidem, I
Forsen, L.
Abyholm, T.
Vangen, S.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (03) : 366 - 366
[38] Variation in, and factors associated with, timing of low-risk, prelabour repeat caesarean section in NSW, 2008-2011
Schemann, Kathrin
Patterson, Jillian A.
Nippita, Tanya A.
Ford, Jane B.
Matha, Deborah
Roberts, ChristineL
PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2016, 26 (01):
[39] Can we predict blood transfusion requirements in caesarean section? A retrospective review
Wai, C.
Okonkwo, I.
Haynes, S.
Smith, S.
ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 : 33 - 33
[40] Blood group and save samples for elective breast surgery: An unnecessary cost?
Chouari, T.
Rangarajan, K.
Howe, T.
Osman, H.
Daoud, R.
Laidlaw, I.
Karat, I.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 138 : S49 - S50

← 1 2 3 4 5 →