Cross-sectional geometry of the metapodial bones in the calf and ox

被引:0
|
作者
Sevil, F. [1 ]
Ocal, M. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Adnan Menderes Univ, Fac Vet, Dept Anat, Aydin, Turkey
来源
DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT | 2006年 / 113卷 / 11期
关键词
bone geometry; bone strength; metacarpus; metatarsus; calf; ox;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to present a detailed description of the cross-sectional geometry at three levels of the metapodial bones and to assess the bone strength from the bone geometry in calf and ox. For this purpose, 20 metapodial bones from five calves and 40 metapodial bones from ten oxen were used. Sections were made at 25, 50 and 75% of the bone length and scanned. The cortical thickness, endosteal and periosteal diameters, cortical and medullar areas as well as second moment of area and section modulus were obtained from the images with the aid of a computer program. The cortical thickness and area values were higher in the metatarsus than that those in the metacarpus. The smallest cortical area and the thinnest cortical thickness were found at the distal level of metapodial bone in both calf and ox. When compared with the calf, relative increases in cortical area were seen at the proximal and distal levels, and the increases in cortical thickness were pronounced in the medial, lateral and dorsal sides in the metacarpus of the ox. With respect to the second moment of area and the polar moment, significant differences between metacarpus and metatarsus were found at the distal half of the bones in the calf while these differences were at the proximal half in the ox. The results of the current study indicated that there were important differences between the metacarpus and metatarsus as well as between the levels of the same bone with regard to the values of the geometric and strength parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 428
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cross-sectional geometry of the femoral midshaft in baboons is heritable
    Hansen, Heather L.
    Bredbenner, Todd L.
    Nicolella, Daniel P.
    Mahaney, Michael C.
    Havill, Lorena M.
    BONE, 2009, 45 (05) : 892 - 897
  • [32] A SLICE GEOMETRY PHANTOM FOR CROSS-SECTIONAL TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGERS
    COFFEY, CW
    TAYLOR, R
    UMSTEAD, G
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (02) : 273 - 278
  • [33] Beer, Bones, and Biomechanics: Investigating the Impacts of Alcohol Use Patterns on Femoral Cross-Sectional Geometry in Young Adult Males
    Brent, Katherine E.
    Komza, Klara
    Cameron, Michelle E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2024, 183 : 22 - 23
  • [34] Experimental Investigation of the Effect of the Cross-Sectional Geometry on the Flow
    Gul, Hasan
    Evin, Duygu
    GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2007, 20 (01): : 7 - 13
  • [35] Fibre collapse and decollapse determined by cross-sectional geometry
    Dickson, A. R.
    Corson, S. R.
    Dooley, N. J.
    JOURNAL OF PULP AND PAPER SCIENCE, 2006, 32 (04): : 205 - 209
  • [36] Heritability of cross-sectional morphology in long bones of anthropoid primates.
    Stein, TA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2000, : 291 - 291
  • [37] EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON THE REGULATION OF THE LONGITUDINAL AND CROSS-SECTIONAL GROWTH OF THE MEDULLARY BONES
    SALAMON, Z
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 1984, 122 (04): : 572 - 572
  • [38] Relationship between calf muscle cross-sectional area and ankle fracture
    Jeon, Ji Young
    Kang, Ho Won
    Kim, Dae Yoo
    Kim, Yun Tae
    Lee, Dong Yeon
    Lee, Dong-Oh
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (08) : 860 - 864
  • [39] Cross-sectional geometry predicts failure location in maize stalks
    Christopher J. Stubbs
    Christopher S. McMahan
    Kaitlin Tabaracci
    Bharath Kunduru
    Rajandeep S. Sekhon
    Daniel J. Robertson
    Plant Methods, 18
  • [40] Second metacarpal cross-sectional geometry: Rehabilitating a circular argument
    Lazenby, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 1998, 10 (06) : 747 - 756