Assessing Relationships Between Muslim Physicians' Religiosity and End-of-Life Health-Care Attitudes and Treatment Recommendations: An Exploratory National Survey

被引:8
|
作者
Duivenbode, Rosie [1 ]
Hall, Stephen [1 ,2 ]
Padela, Aasim I. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Initiat Islam & Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, Sect Emergency Med, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
关键词
clinical ethics; shared decision-making; Muslim bioethics; quality of life; life-sustaining treatment; US PHYSICIANS; MEDICAL DECISION; BELIEFS; ASSOCIATION; AFFILIATION; SENSE;
D O I
10.1177/1049909119833335
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Research demonstrates that the attitudes of religious physicians toward end-of-life care treatment can differ substantially from their nonreligious colleagues. While there are various religious perspectives regarding treatment near the end of life, the attitudes of Muslim physicians in this area are largely unknown. Objective: This article attempts to fill in this gap by presenting American Muslim physician attitudes toward end-of-life care decision-making and by examining associations between physician religiosity and these attitudes. Methods: A randomized national sample of 626 Muslim physicians completed a mailed questionnaire assessing religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes. Religiosity, religious practice, and bioethics resource utilization were analyzed as predictors of quality-of-life considerations, attitudes regarding withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, and end-of-life treatment recommendations at the bivariate and multivariable level. Results: Two-hundred fifty-five (41% response rate) respondents completed surveys. Most physicians reported that religion was either very or the most important part of their life (89%). Physicians who reported consulting Islamic bioethics literature more often had higher odds of recommending active treatment over hospice care in an end-of-life case vignette. Physicians who were more religious had higher odds of viewing withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment more ethically and psychologically challenging than withholding it and had lower odds of agreeing that one should always comply with a competent patient's request to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Discussion: Religiosity appears to impact Muslim physician attitudes toward various aspects of end-of-life health-care decision-making. Greater research is needed to evaluate how this relationship manifests itself in patient care conversations and shared clinical decision-making in the hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 788
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [41] Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
    Yun, Young Ho
    Kim, Kyoung-Nam
    Sim, Jin-Ah
    Yoo, Shin Hye
    Kim, Miso
    Kim, Young Ae
    Kang, Beo Deul
    Shim, Hyun-Jeong
    Song, Eun-Kee
    Kang, Jung Hun
    Kwon, Jung Hye
    Lee, Jung Lim
    Nam, Eun Mi
    Maeng, Chi Hoon
    Kang, Eun Joo
    Do, Young Rok
    Choi, Yoon Seok
    Jung, Kyung Hae
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (09):