A comparative study of software process improvement implementation success factors

被引:32
|
作者
Niazi, Mahmood [1 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
software process improvement implementation; CMMI; critical success factors; DE-MOTIVATORS; MATURITY; FRAMEWORK; CMM;
D O I
10.1002/smr.1704
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
CONTEXT - It has been observed that software process improvement (SPI) initiatives have been around for more than a decade, yet many companies are still facing SPI implementation challenges. OBJECTIVE - In this paper, a systematic literature review (SLR) has been conducted, and the results are compared with the previously collected data of SPI implementation success factors. The overarching objective of this research is to gain an in-depth understanding of success factors that play a positive role in SPI implementation; this will assist SPI managers in better designing and managing SPI programs. We are interested to discover if there are any differences in the success factors identified by the three research strategies used, that is, informal literature review, SLR, and interviews. METHOD - Data were collected and analyzed using the three research strategies. For informal literature review, the snowballing technique was used. The SLR was conducted for formal literature reviews. For an empirical study, interviews were conducted with Australian SPI practitioners. RESULTS -Results show that (i) senior management commitment and (ii) staff involvement are the frequently cited common SPI success factors in all three research strategies. The results also uncover similarities and differences among the three research strategies regarding the importance of the SPI success factors: (i) SPI awareness is a frequently cited common SPI success factor in interviews and formal literature review, and the Spearman's rank-order correlation is r(s)(37) = 0.413, p = 0.011; (ii) reviews are a frequently cited common SPI success factor in formal and informal literature reviews, and the Spearman's rank-order correlation is r(s)(37) = 0.517, p = 0.001; and (iii) training and mentoring is a frequently cited common SPI success factor in interviews and an informal literature review, and the Spearman's rank-order correlation is r(s)(37) = 0.195, p = 0.247. CONCLUSIONS - The understanding of these factors can help both researchers and software development organizations in successfully planning and implementing SPI initiatives. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:700 / 722
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Success Factors of Organizational Change in Software Process Improvement: A Systematic Literature Review
    Zahra, Kinza
    Azam, Farooque
    Ilyas, Fauqia
    Faisal, Huma
    Ambreen, Nadia
    Gondal, Nida
    ICIET'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, 2017, : 155 - 160
  • [22] The implementation of software process improvement models
    Faculty of Computer Science and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Perlis Campus 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Int. Rev. Comput. Softw., 2009, 3 (402-407):
  • [23] A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement: an empirical study
    Niazi, M
    Wilson, D
    Zowghi, D
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2005, 74 (02) : 155 - 172
  • [24] Critical barriers for software process improvement implementation: An empirical study
    Niazi, M
    Wilson, D
    Zowghi, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2004, : 389 - 395
  • [25] Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development
    Khan, Arif Ali
    Shameem, Mohammad
    Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan
    Hussain, Shahid
    Yan, Xuefeng
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 83
  • [26] Software Process Improvement through Experience Management: An Empirical Analysis of Critical Success Factors
    Sharma, Neeraj
    Singh, Kawaljeet
    Goyal, D. P.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 54 : 386 - +
  • [27] Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis
    Rainer, A
    Hall, T
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2002, 62 (02) : 71 - 84
  • [28] An empirical study of barriers in the implementation of software process improvement project in Malaysia
    Nasir, M.H.N.M.
    Ahmad, R.
    Hassan, N.H.
    Journal of Applied Sciences, 2008, 8 (23) : 4362 - 4368
  • [29] How the Company Manages Critical Success Factors in Software Process Improvement Initiatives: Pilot Case-Study in Finnish Software Company
    Pekki, Jaana
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, EUROSPI 2016, 2016, 633 : 188 - 199
  • [30] A maturity model for the implementation of software process improvement
    Niazi, M
    Wilson, D
    SERP'03: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 650 - 655