A comparative study of software process improvement implementation success factors

被引:32
|
作者
Niazi, Mahmood [1 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
software process improvement implementation; CMMI; critical success factors; DE-MOTIVATORS; MATURITY; FRAMEWORK; CMM;
D O I
10.1002/smr.1704
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
CONTEXT - It has been observed that software process improvement (SPI) initiatives have been around for more than a decade, yet many companies are still facing SPI implementation challenges. OBJECTIVE - In this paper, a systematic literature review (SLR) has been conducted, and the results are compared with the previously collected data of SPI implementation success factors. The overarching objective of this research is to gain an in-depth understanding of success factors that play a positive role in SPI implementation; this will assist SPI managers in better designing and managing SPI programs. We are interested to discover if there are any differences in the success factors identified by the three research strategies used, that is, informal literature review, SLR, and interviews. METHOD - Data were collected and analyzed using the three research strategies. For informal literature review, the snowballing technique was used. The SLR was conducted for formal literature reviews. For an empirical study, interviews were conducted with Australian SPI practitioners. RESULTS -Results show that (i) senior management commitment and (ii) staff involvement are the frequently cited common SPI success factors in all three research strategies. The results also uncover similarities and differences among the three research strategies regarding the importance of the SPI success factors: (i) SPI awareness is a frequently cited common SPI success factor in interviews and formal literature review, and the Spearman's rank-order correlation is r(s)(37) = 0.413, p = 0.011; (ii) reviews are a frequently cited common SPI success factor in formal and informal literature reviews, and the Spearman's rank-order correlation is r(s)(37) = 0.517, p = 0.001; and (iii) training and mentoring is a frequently cited common SPI success factor in interviews and an informal literature review, and the Spearman's rank-order correlation is r(s)(37) = 0.195, p = 0.247. CONCLUSIONS - The understanding of these factors can help both researchers and software development organizations in successfully planning and implementing SPI initiatives. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:700 / 722
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Critical success factors for software process improvement implementation: An empirical study
    Niazi, Mahmood
    Wilson, David
    Zowghi, Didar
    Software Process Improvement and Practice, 2006, 11 (02): : 193 - 211
  • [2] The Organisational Factors of Software Process Improvement in Small Software Industry: Comparative Study
    Basri, Shuib
    Almomani, Malek Ahmad
    Imam, Abdullahi Abubakar
    Thangiah, Murugan
    Gilal, Abdul Rehman
    Balogun, Abdullateef Oluwagbemiga
    EMERGING TRENDS IN INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS: DATA SCIENCE, INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SMART COMPUTING, 2020, 1073 : 1132 - 1143
  • [3] Success factors and implementation strategies for process improvement teams
    Randall, KA
    McGuire, EG
    ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROCEEDING OF THE AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1997, : 608 - 610
  • [4] Is Gamification a Way to a Softer Software Process Improvement? A Preliminary Study of Success Factors
    Herranz, Eduardo
    Colomo-Palacios, Ricardo
    SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (EUROSPI 2018), 2018, 896 : 207 - 218
  • [5] Resistance Factors in the Implementation of Software Process Improvement Project
    Nasir, Mohd Hairul Nizam Md.
    Ahmad, Rodina
    Hassan, Noor Hafizah
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2008, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS: COGNITIVE INFORMATICS: BRIDGING NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL KNOWLEDGE, 2008, : 2703 - 2712
  • [6] A Case Study of Software Process Improvement Implementation
    Peixoto, Daniela C. C.
    Bastista, Vitor A.
    Resende, Rodolfo F.
    Padua, Clarindo Isaias P. S.
    22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING (SEKE 2010), 2010, : 716 - 721
  • [7] An Empirical Framework of key Success Factors for Software Process Improvement
    Bunditwongrat, Nuntarat
    Thongmak, Mathupayas
    Ngarmyarn, Atcharawan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2011, : 82 - 90
  • [8] Breaking old Habits: On Success Factors in Software Process Improvement
    Vasylieva, Kseniia
    Kuepper, Steffen
    Kuhrmann, Marco
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS PROCESSES, ICSSP 2024, 2024, : 13 - 23
  • [9] Instrument for measuring the key factors of success in software process improvement
    Dybå T.
    Empirical Software Engineering, 2000, 5 (04) : 357 - 390
  • [10] An empirical investigation of the key factors for success in software process improvement
    Dybå, T
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2005, 31 (05) : 410 - 424