Effect of two different healing times on the mineralization of newly formed bone using a bovine bone substitute in sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled, clinical and histological investigation

被引:13
|
作者
Kohal, Ralf Joachim [1 ]
Gubik, Sonja [2 ]
Strohl, Christine [3 ]
Stampf, Susanne [4 ]
Baechle, Maria [1 ]
Hurrle, Adrian Alexander [1 ]
Patzelt, Sebastian Berthold Maximilian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Ctr Dent Med Med Ctr, Dept Prosthet Dent, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Ctr Dent Oral & Maxillary Med, Dept Orthodont & Orofacial Orthoped, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Ctr Dent Med, Dept Orthodont, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Clin Res, Clin Epidemiol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
bone regeneration; bone substitute; dental materials; histology; microscopy; oral implants; MAXILLARY SINUS; AUTOGENOUS BONE; BIO-OSS; MEMBRANE PERFORATION; POSTERIOR MAXILLA; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; DENTAL IMPLANTS; LIFT PROCEDURES; FOLLOW-UP; PART;
D O I
10.1111/jcpe.12466
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the amount of the mineralization of a bovine bone substitute material in sinus floor augmentation after healing times of 3 and 6 months. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one patients were randomized into two healing time groups and received sinus floor augmentations with a bovine bone material. After 3 or 6 months of healing, trephine bone biopsies were retrieved. The biopsies were processed for histological and histomorphometric evaluations to primarily investigate the amount of mineralized bone in the augmented area and secondarily compare the amount of mineralized bone in the augmented area and in the pristine bone. Statistical tests were performed to analyse the fraction of the mineralized bone (p < 0.05). Results: The biopsies of both groups showed remnants of the well-integrated bone substitute material. The histology revealed osteoblasts, osteocytes with osteoid, and osteoclasts. The mean percentage of mineralized bone in the augmented area was 23.8% (3 months group) and 23.6% (6 months group; p = 0.9246); the amount of remaining bone substitute material was 35% (3 months group) and 33.9% (6 months group; p = 0.6325). Conclusion: It can be concluded that the bone maturation in the augmented sinus using the bovine bone material is similar after 3 and 6 months. Thus, implant installation after 3 months following a lateral window sinus floor augmentation approach using a bovine bone material seems to be clinically acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:1052 / 1059
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Histomorphometric Analysis of Newly Formed Bone After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Ground Cortical Bone Allograft and Internal Collagen Membrane
    Kolerman, Roni
    Tal, Haim
    Moses, Ofer
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2008, 79 (11) : 2104 - 2111
  • [12] Histological and radiological evaluation of sintered and non-sintered deproteinized bovine bone substitute materials in sinus augmentation procedures. A prospective, randomized-controlled, clinical multicenter study
    Fienitz, Tim
    Moses, Ofer
    Klemm, Christoph
    Happe, Arndt
    Ferrari, Daniel
    Kreppel, Matthias
    Ormianer, Zeev
    Gal, Moti
    Rothamel, Daniel
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (03) : 787 - 794
  • [13] Histological and radiological evaluation of sintered and non-sintered deproteinized bovine bone substitute materials in sinus augmentation procedures. A prospective, randomized-controlled, clinical multicenter study
    Tim Fienitz
    Ofer Moses
    Christoph Klemm
    Arndt Happe
    Daniel Ferrari
    Matthias Kreppel
    Zeev Ormianer
    Moti Gal
    Daniel Rothamel
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2017, 21 : 787 - 794
  • [14] Implant stability after sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles of different sizes: a prospective, randomized and controlled split-mouth clinical trial
    dos Anjos, T. L. M. R.
    de Molon, R. S.
    Paim, P. R. F.
    Marcantonio, E.
    Marcantonio, E., Jr.
    Faeda, R. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (12) : 1556 - 1563
  • [15] Histomorphometric analysis of sinus augmentation using bovine bone mineral with two different resorbable membranes
    Choi, So-Young
    Jang, Yoon-Je
    Choi, Je-Yong
    Jeong, Jae-Hwan
    Kwon, Tae-Geon
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 : 68 - 74
  • [16] Reimplantation of cultivated human bone cells from the posterior maxilla for sinus floor augmentation. Histological results from a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Hermund, Niels Ulrich
    Stavropoulos, Andreas
    Donatsky, Ole
    Nielsen, Henrik
    Clausen, Christian
    Reibel, Jesper
    Pakkenberg, Bente
    Holmstrup, Palle
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (09) : 1031 - 1037
  • [17] Histomorphometric Evaluation of Two Different Bone Substitutes in Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Humans
    Rodriguez y Baena, Ruggero
    Pastorino, Roberta
    Gherlone, Enrico Felice
    Perillo, Letizia
    Lupi, Saturnino Marco
    Lucchese, Alessandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 188 - 194
  • [18] Bone Formed After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation by Bone Autografting With Hydroxyapatite and Low-Level Laser Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Histomorphometrical and Immunohistochemical Analyses
    Theodoro, Leticia Helena
    Rocha, Gustavo Spina
    Ribeiro Junior, Valmir Lucas
    Sakakura, Celso Eduardo
    de Mello Neto, Joao Martins
    Garcia, Valdir Gouveia
    Ervolino, Edilson
    Marcantonio Junior, Elcio
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (05) : 547 - 554
  • [19] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation to Enable One-Stage Implant Placement by Using Bovine Bone Substitute and Platelet-Rich Fibrin
    Barbu, Horia Mihail
    Andreescu, Claudia Florina
    Comaneanu, Monica Raluca
    Referendaru, Daniel
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [20] Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement - Clinical and histological findings
    Cordioli, G
    Mazzocco, C
    Schepers, E
    Brugnolo, E
    Majzoub, Z
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (03) : 270 - 278