[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Vasc Dept, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Kungalvs Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Kungalv, Sweden
来源:
BMJ OPEN
|
2020年
/
10卷
/
10期
关键词:
intensive & critical care;
health & safety;
quality in health care;
CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS;
PATIENT SAFETY;
ADVERSE EVENTS;
WORK;
QUALITY;
VALIDITY;
FRAMEWORK;
TEAMWORK;
D O I:
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038424
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objective To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a scale measuring patient safety during the intrahospital transport process for intensive care. Design The scale was developed based on a theoretical model of the work system and patient safety, and items generated from participant observations. A Delphi study with international experts was used to establish content validity. Next, a cross-sectional study was undertaken to inform item reduction and evaluate construct validity and internal consistency. Setting The questionnaire was distributed to healthcare practitioners at 12 intensive care units in Sweden. Participants A total of 315 questionnaires were completed. Eligible participants were healthcare practitioners in the included units that performed an intrahospital transport during the study period. Inclusion criteria were (1) transports of patients within the hospital to undergo an examination or intervention, and (2) transports performed by staff from the intensive care unit. We excluded transports to a step-down unit or hospital ward. Outcome measures Psychometric evaluation, including item analysis, validity and reliability testing. Results Items were reduced from 55 to 24, informed by distributional statistics, initial reliabilities, factor loadings and communalities. The final factor model consisted of five factors, accounting for 59% of variance. All items loaded significantly on only one factor (>0.35). The original conceptual model of teamwork, transport-related tasks, tools and technologies, environment, and organisation was maintained with regrouping of items. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.72 to 0.82 for each subscale (ie, factor). Conclusions The present study provides a self-report questionnaire to assess patient safety during intrahospital transport of patients in intensive care. The results indicate acceptable validity and reliability of the scale among a sample of Swedish healthcare practitioners. If further confirmatory testing supports the present results, this scale could be a useful tool to better understand safety prerequisites and improve clinical practice.
机构:
Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, 560 West 168th St,Off 603, New York, NY 10032 USAColumbia Univ, Sch Nursing, 560 West 168th St,Off 603, New York, NY 10032 USA
Norful, Allison A.
Liu, Jianfang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, 560 West 168th St,Off 603, New York, NY 10032 USAColumbia Univ, Sch Nursing, 560 West 168th St,Off 603, New York, NY 10032 USA
Liu, Jianfang
Shaffer, Jonathan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USAColumbia Univ, Sch Nursing, 560 West 168th St,Off 603, New York, NY 10032 USA
机构:
Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M6K 2R7, Canada
Univ Toronto, Lawrence S Bloomberg Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
Minist Hlth & Long Term Care, Toronto, ON, CanadaToronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M6K 2R7, Canada