Managerial Compensation and Firm Value in the Presence of Socially Responsible Investors

被引:3
|
作者
Chaigneau, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] HEC Montreal, 3000 Chemin Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 2AT, Canada
关键词
Corporate social performance (CSP); Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Executive compensation; Fiduciary duty; Incentive contracts; Principal-agent model; Socially responsible investment (SRI); FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; CORPORATE; PERSPECTIVE; INCENTIVES; EQUILIBRIUM; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-016-3115-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Shareholders with standard monetary preferences will give a manager incentives to increase firm profits, which can be achieved with equity grants. When shareholders are socially responsible, in the sense that they also value corporate social performance, it is not clear which incentives the manager should receive. Yet, in a standard principal-agent model, we show that the optimal contract is surprisingly simple: it consists in giving equity holdings to the manager. This is notably because the stock price will incorporate expected profits as well as the social performance of the firm, to the extent that it is valued by shareholders. Consequently, equity holdings give the manager incentives to jointly maximize the profits and the social performance of the firm according to shareholders' preferences. To facilitate alignment of interests, more socially responsible firms will optimally hire more socially responsible managers. We conclude that neither the shareholder primacy model nor equity-based managerial compensation is necessarily inconsistent with the attainment of social objectives.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 768
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is a portfolio of socially responsible firms profitable for investors?
    Rehman, Mobeen Ur
    Xuan-Vinh Vo
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 2020, 10 (02) : 191 - 212
  • [22] Effect of SME's Managerial Ability and Executive Compensation on Firm Value
    Park, Won
    Byun, Chunggyu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [23] Endogenous Timing with a Socially Responsible Firm
    Garcia, Arturo
    Leal, Mariel
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    KOREAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 35 (02): : 345 - 370
  • [24] THE SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FIRM AND COMPARABLE WORTH
    BROWNE, MN
    GIAMPETRO, AM
    AMERICAN BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL, 1987, 25 (03) : 467 - 486
  • [25] Effect of Entry into Socially Responsible Investment Index on Cost of Equity and Firm Value
    Eom, Kijung
    Nam, Giseok
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (05):
  • [26] Institutional Investors, Managerial Ownership, and Executive Compensation
    Janakiraman, Surya
    Radhakrishnan, Suresh
    Tsang, Albert
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2010, 25 (04): : 673 - 707
  • [27] Executive compensation in socially responsible firms
    Frye, Melissa B.
    Nelling, Edward
    Webb, Elizabeth
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2006, 14 (05) : 446 - 455
  • [28] Measuring Investors’ Socially Responsible Preferences in Mutual Funds
    Iván Barreda-Tarrazona
    Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez
    Mª Rosario Balaguer-Franch
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2011, 103
  • [29] Measuring Investors' Socially Responsible Preferences in Mutual Funds
    Barreda-Tarrazona, Ivan
    Carlos Matallin-Saez, Juan
    Rosario Balaguer-Franch, Ma
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 103 (02) : 305 - 330
  • [30] Socially responsible investors and the micro entrepreneur: A Canadian case
    Hudson, R
    Wehrell, R
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2005, 60 (03) : 281 - 292