Simulation of soil water, bromide and pesticide behaviour in soil with the GLEAMS model

被引:15
|
作者
Rekolainen, S
Gouy, V
Francaviglia, R
Eklo, OM
Bärlund, I
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Cemagref, Agr & Environm Engn Res, F-69366 Lyon, France
[3] Inst Sperimentale Nutr Piante, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[4] Norwegian Crop Res Inst, Plant Protect Ctr, N-1432 As Nlh, Norway
关键词
simulation models; pesticide leaching; model validation; water transport; solute transport;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00092-X
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The GLEAMS model predicts runoff, percolation and soil and chemical losses at the edge of a field and from the root zone. The objective of this study was to test the performance of the GLEAMS model against three observed data sets from different parts of Europe. Three users tested the model independently, i.e, parametrized the model without discussion with the other users. Both uncalibrated and calibrated results are presented. Furthermore, the pesticide sub-model was parametrized according to proposals of the supplier of the measurement data. The test was focused on soil moisture, tracer (bromide) and pesticide movements in soil columns. The results show that GLEAMS soil moisture predictions appear to react too rapidly to wet and dry periods, resulting in a rapid change of soil moisture between field capacity and wilting point. Incomplete simulation of soil water dynamics seems to be the main reason for underestimation of tracer movement in soil. In addition, mismatches in soil pesticide concentrations might be caused by incorrect prediction of degradation processes. The results of the independent users differed considerably from each other, both in uncalibrated and in calibrated results, due to different interpretation of the measured data. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 224
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Physicoempirical Model for Soil Water Simulation in Crop Root Zone
    SHANG Song-Hao 1
    Pedosphere, 2011, 21 (04) : 512 - 521
  • [42] Simulation model of water infiltration in soil using combination technique
    Marqasi, M.
    Hashemi, S. R.
    Siuki, A. Khashei
    Shahidi, A.
    Neyshabouri, S. Zeraati
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 14 (11)
  • [43] DYNAMIC SIMULATION-MODEL OF VERTICAL INFILTRATION OF WATER IN SOIL
    LEE, J
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1992, 37 (03): : 290 - 292
  • [44] A Soil Water Simulation Model for Wheat Field with Temporary Ditches
    Shi, Chunlin
    Liu, Yang
    Xuan, Shouli
    Jin, Zhiqing
    COMPUTER AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE IX, CCTA 2015, PT II, 2016, 479 : 217 - 224
  • [45] Pesticide residues degradation strategies in soil and water: a review
    R. Kaur
    D. Singh
    A. Kumari
    G. Sharma
    S. Rajput
    S. Arora
    R. Kaur
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 3537 - 3560
  • [46] Pesticide residues degradation strategies in soil and water: a review
    Kaur, R.
    Singh, D.
    Kumari, A.
    Sharma, G.
    Rajput, S.
    Arora, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (03) : 3537 - 3560
  • [47] Sorption of a hydrophilic pesticide: Effects of soil water content
    Ochsner, T. E.
    Stephens, B. M.
    Koskinen, W. C.
    Kookana, R. S.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2006, 70 (06) : 1991 - 1997
  • [48] Simulation of vertical water flow and bromide transport under temporarily very dry soil conditions
    Sambale, C
    Peschke, G
    Uhlenbrook, S
    Leibundgut, C
    Markert, B
    TRACERS AND MODELLING IN HYDROGEOLOGY, 2000, (262): : 339 - 345
  • [49] BROMIDE AS A CONSERVATIVE TRACER FOR SOIL-WATER STUDIES
    LEVY, BS
    CHAMBERS, RM
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1987, 1 (04) : 385 - 389
  • [50] Transport of bromide in the Bainsvlei soil: Field experiment and deterministic/stochastic model simulation. I. Continuous water application
    Tilahun, K
    Botha, JF
    Bennie, ATP
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (01): : 73 - 80