Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomised controlled trial

被引:133
|
作者
Kremer, C [1 ]
Duffy, S [1 ]
Moroney, M [1 ]
机构
[1] St James Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2000年 / 320卷 / 7230期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.320.7230.279
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare outpatient hysteroscopy with day case hysteroscopy in terms of patient satisfaction and acceptability. Setting Gynaecology clinic of a teaching hospital. Participants 100 women. Design and interventions Patients were randomly allocated to outpatient hysteroscopy or day case hysteroscopy provided they had no preference for either procedure. Main outcome measures Satisfaction rate, requirements for postoperative analgesia, speed of recovery, time away from home, and time off work. Results The outpatient group recovered preoperative fitness more quickly than the day case group (2 days (range 1-2.7) versus 3 days (2-4), P < 0.05). After the procedure, the outpatient group were also fully mobile more quickly than the day case group (0 minutes (0-5) versus 105 minutes (80-120), P < 0.001). Requirements for postoperative analgesia were similar in both groups. Overall, 78% of patients considered that the pain from outpatient hysteroscopy was less than that usually experienced during menstruation. Patient satisfaction was similar in both groups (83.6% in the outpatient group versus 77.0% in the day case group). Conclusions Outpatient hysteroscopy and day case hysteroscopy were equally acceptable to patients. Patients recovered significantly more quickly from outpatient hysteroscopy than from day case hysteroscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 282
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient and provider satisfaction with saline ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy for uterine cavity evaluation prior to in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial
    Sarah Moustafa
    Emma Rosen
    Linnea Goodman
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2021, 38 : 627 - 634
  • [42] Patient and provider satisfaction with saline ultrasound versus office hysteroscopy for uterine cavity evaluation prior to in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial
    Moustafa, Sarah
    Rosen, Emma
    Goodman, Linnea
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (03) : 627 - 634
  • [43] Intravenous lidocaine attenuates response to cervical dilation for hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial
    Xu, Lili
    Wang, Chun
    Dai, Shaobing
    Shen, Jianjun
    Chen, Xiaoping
    Kee, Warwick D. Ngan
    Chen, Xinzhong
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 127 (05) : E167 - E169
  • [44] Do women having an outpatient hysteroscopy have a higher anxiety level compared to a day case hysteroscopy? A prospective questionnaire research study
    Wong, I. K. C.
    Visvanathan, D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 223 - 224
  • [45] Hysteroscopy before in-vitro fertilisation (inSIGHT): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Smit, Janine G.
    Kasius, Jenneke C.
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    Koks, Carolien A. M.
    van Golde, Ronald
    Nap, Annemiek W.
    Scheffer, Gabrielle J.
    Manger, Petra A. P.
    Hoek, Annemieke
    Schoot, Benedictus C.
    van Heusden, Arne M.
    Kuchenbecker, Walter K. H.
    Perquin, Denise A. M.
    Fleischer, Kathrin
    Kaaijk, Eugenie M.
    Sluijmer, Alexander
    Friederich, Jaap
    Dykgraaf, Ramon H. M.
    van Hooff, Marcel
    Louwe, Leonie A.
    Kwee, Janet
    de Koning, Corry H.
    Janssen, Ineke C. A. H.
    Mol, Femke
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    Torrance, Helen L.
    LANCET, 2016, 387 (10038): : 2622 - 2629
  • [46] Carbon dioxide versus normal saline in outpatient hysteroscopy
    Litta, P
    Bonora, M
    Pozzan, C
    Merlin, F
    Sacco, G
    Fracas, M
    Capobianco, G
    Dessole, S
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (11) : 2446 - 2449
  • [47] Outpatient hysteroscopy:: traditional versus the 'no-touch' technique
    Sharma, M
    Taylor, A
    Sardo, AD
    Buck, L
    Mastrogamvrakis, G
    Kosmas, I
    Tsirkas, P
    Magos, A
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (07) : 963 - 967
  • [48] A randomized trial of outpatient hysteroscopy with and without intrauterine anesthesia
    Kabli, Nadia
    Tulandi, Togas
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) : 308 - 310
  • [49] Nitrous oxide versus lidocaine versus no analgesic for in-office hysteroscopy: a randomised clinical trial
    Solano Calvo, J. A.
    del Valle Rubido, C.
    Rodriguez-Miguel, A.
    de Abajo, F. J.
    Delgado Espeja, J. J.
    Gonzalez Hinojosa, J.
    Fernandez Munoz, L.
    Zapico Goni, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (08) : 1364 - 1372
  • [50] Vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming prior to diagnostic hysteroscopy––efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial
    Neeta Singh
    Bhaswati Ghosh
    Moumita Naha
    Suneeta Mittal
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009, 279 : 37 - 40