Resolution depths for some transmitter-receiver configurations

被引:5
|
作者
Smith, JT [1 ]
Morrison, HF [1 ]
Becker, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2004年 / 42卷 / 06期
关键词
dipole polarizabilities; electromagnetic induction; unexploded ordnance;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2004.826788
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Equivalent dipole polarizability matrices and equivalent dipole location are a convenient way to interpret magnetic field data due to currents induced in isolated conductive objects. The uncertainties in polarizability estimates and in the equivalent dipole location provide a quantitative measure of the performance of different configurations of transmitters and receivers. In another paper, we estimate these uncertainties using a linearized inversion. For many systems, consisting of one or more rectangular loop transmitters and a number of dipole receivers, sited on a horizontal grid, equivalent dipole depth is determined to 10% accuracy to depths approximately 20% deeper than the depths at which polarizability matrix elements can be determined to the same precision. Systems that have a lower product of rms polarizability uncertainty and square root of their number of transmitter-receiver pairs are considered more effective for the number of transmitter-receiver pairs. Among the systems studied, a system with three orthogonal transmitter loops and a three-component receiver is the most effective, for objects shallower than 0.6 times the instrument siting grid spacing, yielding an rms polarizability uncertainty 0.04 times that of a single-transmitter single-receiver system. At intermediate depths, a system with two vertical component receivers on the diagonal of a square horizontal transmitter loop is most effective for its number of transmitter-receiver pairs, yielding an rms polarizability uncertainty 0.07 times that of a single receiver system. At depths greater than 2.5 times, the siting grid spacing a three-orthogonal loop transmitter with a single vertical component receiver is about the most effective for its number of transmitter-receiver pairs, yielding an rms polarizability uncertainty 0.08 times that of a single-transmitter system.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1221
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fast high-Tc superconductor transmitter-receiver switch
    St. Petersburg State, Electrotechnical Univ, St. Petersburg, Russia
    Electron Lett, 15 (1344-1345):
  • [42] Optimization of the transmitter-receiver separation in the ground-penetrating radar
    Gürel, L
    Oguz, U
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2003, 51 (03) : 362 - 370
  • [43] PERFORMANCE OF MAGNETIC LOOP TRANSMITTER-RECEIVER SYSTEM SUBMERGED IN SEA
    DUNBAR, RM
    RADIO AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEER, 1972, 42 (10): : 457 - +
  • [44] Artificial Noise Elimination Without the Transmitter-Receiver Link CSI
    Niu, Hong
    Lei, Xia
    Wu, Gang
    Wang, Gang
    Yuen, Chau
    Adachi, Fumiyuki
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 73 (09) : 13206 - 13218
  • [45] COMPACT 60-GHZ TRANSMITTER-RECEIVER FRONT END
    MATSUO, Y
    AKAIWA, Y
    TAKASE, I
    NEC RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 1977, (46): : 12 - 17
  • [46] 40-GHZ PCM-FSK TRANSMITTER-RECEIVER
    MINAMI, S
    KASUGA, O
    KANEKO, K
    MIURA, H
    OHSAKO, M
    NEC RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 1983, (69): : 102 - 107
  • [47] A 400MHZ CMOS PACKET TRANSMITTER-RECEIVER CHIP
    LEE, AJH
    SABNIS, JA
    SANISKI, MW
    SAMPSON, GP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE 1989 CUSTOM INTEGRATED CIRCUITS CONFERENCE, 1989, : 469 - 472
  • [49] Optimal Offline and Competitive Online Strategies for Transmitter-Receiver Energy Harvesting
    Nagda, Rushil
    Satpathi, Siddhartha
    Vaze, Rahul
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (ICC), 2015, : 74 - 79
  • [50] Real-time simulation of impairments in the analog parts of the transmitter-receiver
    Kiviranta, M
    Mämmelä, A
    Zhang, Y
    Moilanen, I
    Boumard, S
    Sarkkinen, T
    Jämsä, T
    VTC2005-SPRING: 2005 IEEE 61ST VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 968 - 972